1997
DOI: 10.1021/ie960586r
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation and Characterization of Paraffins and Naphthenes from FCC Feedstocks

Abstract: A separation technique was developed for the characterization and identification of the nonaromatic fraction of a light and a heavy FCC feedstock (gas−oil). The separation of the paraffins was based upon the selective reaction of n-paraffins with urea and branched paraffins with thiourea. One more method based on the molecular sieves adsorption was also applied for n-paraffin separation, but the urea method was found to be more satisfactory. The total recovery of the method was about 70%. All the fractions wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Initially, the tests followed the procedure suggested by Canuel (personal communication), 58 in which the crystal formation is carried out at low temperature to recover the low molecular weight (LMW) n-alkanes. 34 It was observed that all the compounds, especially the LMW n-alkanes, appeared in the non-adducted fraction, which means they were not completely adducted by the crystals. To verify if the -4 °C cooling was responsible for this low efficiency in in experiments A, B and D; < 60% for all compounds in experiments D and E; < 61% for all compounds in experiments C and G. Experiment F showed recovery > 80% from n-C 22 to n-C 40 .…”
Section: N-alkanes Isolation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Initially, the tests followed the procedure suggested by Canuel (personal communication), 58 in which the crystal formation is carried out at low temperature to recover the low molecular weight (LMW) n-alkanes. 34 It was observed that all the compounds, especially the LMW n-alkanes, appeared in the non-adducted fraction, which means they were not completely adducted by the crystals. To verify if the -4 °C cooling was responsible for this low efficiency in in experiments A, B and D; < 60% for all compounds in experiments D and E; < 61% for all compounds in experiments C and G. Experiment F showed recovery > 80% from n-C 22 to n-C 40 .…”
Section: N-alkanes Isolation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The tested methods were 5A molecular sieves 31,32 and urea adduction [33][34][35][36] to remove cyclic and branched compounds; and silica impregnated with AgNO 3 column for n-alkenes removal. 37 To evaluate quantitatively the possible losses that could occur from the various steps of each procedure, several experiments were conducted with a standard mixture containing the n-alkanes C 12 -C 40 and the isoprenoids pristane (Pr) and phytane (Ph) (AccuStandard, 500 µg mL −1 ).…”
Section: Experimental N-alkanes Isolation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The solvents are completely removed by evaporation and the residues are weighed and calculated as the non-aromatics and aromatics fractions of the sample. Full details for this method are given in the literature (Lappas et al, 1997a, Lappas et al, 1997b.…”
Section: Aromatics Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cyclic alkanes were fractionated from the TuO by the method of Lappas et al (1997) with slight modifications. Briefly, 50 ml of methanol and 30 g of urea were added to 10 g of TuO, and shaken at 160 rpm, for 30 min at 55 ºC, for 1.5 h at room temperature, and 8 for 30 min at 10 ºC.…”
Section: Fractionation Of Tuomentioning
confidence: 99%