“…However, the derivative method has its weak point in that the difference of fragment ion intensity is weak and only the samples in which the target components can be perfectly separated on the chromatogram are available. Recently, the dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) adduct method is widely used to determine the double‐bond positions (Buser, Arn, Guerin, & Rauscher, ; Carballeira, Shalabi, & Cruz, ; Christie, ; Dunkelblum, Tan, & Silk, ; Francis, ; Scribe, Guezennec, Dagaut, Pepe, & Saliot, ; Shibahara, Yamamoto, Kinoshita, & Anderson, ; Shibahara, Yamamoto, Nakayama, & Kajimoto, , ; Shibahara, Yamamoto, Shinkai, Nakayama, & Kajimoto, ; Shibamoto, Gooley, & Yamamoto, ; Shibamoto, Murata, & Yamamoto, ; Vincent, Guglielmetti, Cassani, & Tonini, ; Yamamoto, Shibahara, Nakayama, & Kajimoto, , , ). One of the advantages of the DMDS method is that the methylthio group is added to each double‐bond carbon, and the characteristic ions in which cleavage occurs between the double‐bond carbons in the mass spectrum can be used to determine the double‐bond positions simply.…”