2003
DOI: 10.1021/es034167e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from Gasoline and Diesel Vehicles Using Chemical Mass Balancing Techniques

Abstract: Samples of fine particulate matter were collected in a roadway tunnel near Houston, TX over a period of 4 days during two separate sampling periods: one sampling period from 1200 to 1400 local time and another sampling period from 1600 to 1800 local time. During the two sampling periods, the tunnel traffic contained roughly equivalent numbers of heavy-duty diesel trucks. However, during the late afternoon sampling period, the tunnel contained twice as many light-duty gasoline-powered vehicles. The effect of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…365 The Houston tunnel studies obtained estimates for gaseous species (CO, NO x , nonmethane hydrocarbons [NMHC]) 362 and PM 2.5 . 363 The NMOC emissions factor was slightly higher than ones obtained in previous studies conducted at least 5 yr earlier, suggesting the current Houston fleet was comprised of older, less 62 Christensen, 495 Magliano, et al, 496 Held et al, 497 Zhao and Hopke 498 Diesel estimated as 58-82% of mobile source apportionment Los Angeles 18 (62% of this from diesel)…”
Section: Emissions: Estimates Inventories and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…365 The Houston tunnel studies obtained estimates for gaseous species (CO, NO x , nonmethane hydrocarbons [NMHC]) 362 and PM 2.5 . 363 The NMOC emissions factor was slightly higher than ones obtained in previous studies conducted at least 5 yr earlier, suggesting the current Houston fleet was comprised of older, less 62 Christensen, 495 Magliano, et al, 496 Held et al, 497 Zhao and Hopke 498 Diesel estimated as 58-82% of mobile source apportionment Los Angeles 18 (62% of this from diesel)…”
Section: Emissions: Estimates Inventories and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…365 The Houston tunnel studies obtained estimates for gaseous species (CO, NO x , nonmethane hydrocarbons [NMHC]) 362 and PM 2.5 . 363 The NMOC emissions factor was slightly higher than ones obtained in previous studies conducted at least 5 yr earlier, suggesting the current Houston fleet was comprised of older, less 338 ). 62 Christensen, 495 Magliano, et al, 496 Held et al, 497 Zhao and Hopke 498 Diesel estimated as 58-82% of mobile source apportionment Los Angeles 18 (62% of this from diesel)…”
Section: Emissions: Estimates Inventories and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Motor vehicle emissions measurements were made in tunnel studies in Houston, TX, 362,363 and Pittsburgh, PA. 364 In each case, fuel-based emissions factors (mass emitted/mass fuel burned) were developed. This approach is believed to vary less over the full range of driving conditions (e.g., vehicle attributes, operating mode) than emissions factors based on vehicle distance traveled (mass emitted/distance).…”
Section: Emissions: Estimates Inventories and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Organic molecular markers have been especially useful for the source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols (Schauer et al, 1996;Chow and Watson, 2002;Lin et al, 2010). Commonly-used organic molecular markers include hopanes and steranes for motor oil emissions (Simoneit, 1999, Phuleria et al 2007Riddle et al, 2008); heavy polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for gasoline exhaust and coal combustion (Robinson et al, 2006); light PAHs for diesel exhaust (Fraser et al, 2003;Riddle et al, 2008); cholesterol for food cooking (Rogge et al, 1991); nalkanes for vegetative detritus (Rogge et al, 1993); and levoglucosan for biomass burning (Simoneit, 2002). In general, the utility of a marker compound depends on how unique it is to a source, and how conserved it is in the atmosphere (i.e., its volatility and/or reactivity) relative to the other primary mass emitted from that source.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%