2009
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2008.2010490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Ground and Low Vegetation Signatures in LiDAR Measurements of Salt-Marsh Environments

Abstract: Abstract-Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has been shown to have a great potential in the accurate characterization of forest systems; however, its application to salt-marsh environments is challenging because the characteristic short vegetation does not give rise to detectable differences between first and last LiDAR returns. Furthermore, the lack of precisely identifiable references (e.g., buildings, roads, etc.) in marsh areas makes the registration and bias correction of the LiDAR data much more difficu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the dense cloud points generated by UAV could capture the entire height information of grassland, including the stem, but not the top of the vegetation. Consequently, inversed average vegetation height was always lower than measured mean canopy height, which was comparable to the results obtained using airborne lidar system [68,69].…”
Section: Estimation Of Grassland Canopy Height From Uavsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, the dense cloud points generated by UAV could capture the entire height information of grassland, including the stem, but not the top of the vegetation. Consequently, inversed average vegetation height was always lower than measured mean canopy height, which was comparable to the results obtained using airborne lidar system [68,69].…”
Section: Estimation Of Grassland Canopy Height From Uavsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The effect of enabling these optional treatments is further discussed in the results section. Although methods exist to account for vegetation cover in the DEM (Hladik and Alber, 2012;Wang et al, 2009;Sadro et al, 2007;Chassereau et al, 2011;Montané and Torres, 2006), we chose not to apply these corrections as we wanted to ensure that the TIP method can be applied without information on the vegetation assemblages at a given site.…”
Section: Preprocessing Topographic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topographic data necessary to identify marsh platforms already exist: the proliferation of freely available highresolution topographic datasets from lidar or structure from motion (SfM) techniques means that DEMs with a grid cell size below 1 m are increasingly common on salt marshes and offer vertical accuracies below 20 cm even without correcting for vegetation (Sadro et al, 2007;Wang et al, 2009;Chassereau et al, 2011). At these resolutions, most scarps and channels are detectable on a DEM, and several automated topographic methods already allow the identification of tidal channel networks (Fagherazzi et al, 1999;Liu et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A forested area that has a dynamic slope and a sharp relief are difficult to filter where LiDAR point outliers might cause errors to the returning pulses. These points have unusually high or low elevation values and must be eliminated during data preprocessing (Meng et al, 2010;Wang et al, 2009). The selection of LiDAR first or last returns during ground filtering have also been debated.…”
Section: Height Estimation and Tree Detection Based On Plot Level Assmentioning
confidence: 99%