1966
DOI: 10.1107/s0365110x66000628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of particle size and lattice strain in integral breadth measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
166
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 439 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
6
166
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the reduction of the structure defects and internal stresses which result from the rearrangement of the atoms in the structure. In order to separate the microstrains ε and crystallites size D effect on the line broadening, we used the approximation introduced by Halder and Wagner [16,17]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is due to the reduction of the structure defects and internal stresses which result from the rearrangement of the atoms in the structure. In order to separate the microstrains ε and crystallites size D effect on the line broadening, we used the approximation introduced by Halder and Wagner [16,17]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison with the Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards (JCPDS) card was done for the identification of the observed peaks. The crystallites size D is calculated from the Halder and Wagner approximation [16,17].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If it is assumed that p(ε) is the Cauchy function and s(ε) is the Gaussian function (which is often cited in the literature), it follows that for the integral widths of the profiles f(ε), p(ε) and s(ε) the following (approximate) equation is valid: [17,18] …”
Section: Information Revealed By Diffraction In Polycrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A successful determination of these microstructural parameters strongly depends on the accurate measurement of profiles of diffraction maxima and on the applied mathematical procedure including a minimization of systematic aberrations. [3,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] For a given diffraction maximum (diffraction line), the observed profile, h(ε), is the convolution of the instrumental profile, g(ε), and pure diffraction profile, f(ε):…”
Section: Information Revealed By Diffraction In Polycrystalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we approximated the crystallite shapes as rectangular; therefore, the Scherrer constant was corrected by multiplying it by 1.3. The effect of the lattice strain on the evolution of the FWHM and peak broadening was calculated by the Williamson-Hall method [63,64] and was found to be negligible. Therefore, Equation (4) was assumed to be adequate for the estimation of the domain size.…”
Section: Pristine Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%