2013
DOI: 10.1186/1687-6180-2013-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of phase-locked sources in pseudo-real MEG data

Abstract: This article addresses the blind separation of linear mixtures of synchronous signals (i.e., signals with locked phases), which is a relevant problem, e.g., in the analysis of electrophysiological signals of the brain such as the electroencephalogram and the magnetoencephalogram (MEG). Popular separation techniques such as independent component analysis are not adequate for phase-locked signals, because such signals have strong mutual dependency. Aiming at unmixing this class of signals, we have recently intro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several phase synchronization measures are less susceptible to common source effects (i.e., volume conduction and magnetic field spread). The common source effect is an inevitable and serious problem in electrophysiological studies (Vinck et al, 2011), and cannot be completely eliminated by source reconstruction methods (Schoffelen and Gross, 2009) or solved by independent component analysis (Almeida et al, 2013). The common source effect is problematic in estimating phase synchronization because it can generate spurious phase synchronization with a phase difference of 0 or 180 degrees (zero-lag) among channels or sensors (Cohen, 2014a;Khadem and Hossein-Zadeh, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several phase synchronization measures are less susceptible to common source effects (i.e., volume conduction and magnetic field spread). The common source effect is an inevitable and serious problem in electrophysiological studies (Vinck et al, 2011), and cannot be completely eliminated by source reconstruction methods (Schoffelen and Gross, 2009) or solved by independent component analysis (Almeida et al, 2013). The common source effect is problematic in estimating phase synchronization because it can generate spurious phase synchronization with a phase difference of 0 or 180 degrees (zero-lag) among channels or sensors (Cohen, 2014a;Khadem and Hossein-Zadeh, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%