1965
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(65)90036-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of phenol and ribonucleic acid by dextran gel filtration (sephadex G-25)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mixture was shaken for 15min and centrifuged at 10000g for lOn1in. Th's treatmIent was repeated until the complete disappearance of the interphase; this step is a modification of the coldphenol procedure described by Cartouzou et al (1968), introduced to complete the deproteinization (Sevag et al, 1938) and also to remove the phenol (Gross et al, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mixture was shaken for 15min and centrifuged at 10000g for lOn1in. Th's treatmIent was repeated until the complete disappearance of the interphase; this step is a modification of the coldphenol procedure described by Cartouzou et al (1968), introduced to complete the deproteinization (Sevag et al, 1938) and also to remove the phenol (Gross et al, 1965).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield was 3.7mg/g of fresh venom gland. The possibility of contamination by protein and phenol was checked by examination of the E260/E280 ratio (Rousseau & Crabbe, 1968) and the E220/E260 ratio (Gross et al, 1965) respectively. The test described by Burton (1956) indicated a negligible contamination by DNA.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Sephadex gel in the preparation of RNA fractions was noted previously (Gross, Skoczylas & Turski, 1965;McCoy & Carter, 1968); however, its application to removal of phenol in the preparation of tRNA appears to have been neglected. The high affinity of Sephadex for phenol (Determann & Walter, 1968) no doubt accounts for the effective separation of large amounts of RNA from phenol that can readily be accomplished by this procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%