2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.108.262501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of Pygmy Dipole andM1Resonances inZr90by a High-Resolution Inelastic Proton Scattering Near 0°

Abstract: A high-resolution measurement of inelastic proton scattering off (90)Zr near 0° was performed at 295 MeV with a focus on a pronounced strength previously reported in the low-energy tail of giant dipole resonance. A forest of fine structure was observed in the excitation energy region 7-12 MeV. A multipole decomposition analysis of the angular distribution for the forest was carried out using the ECIS95 distorted-wave Born approximation code with the Hartree-Fock plus random-phase approximation model of E1 and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the electromagnetic character of the increased strength for E γ > 4 MeV is also uncertain. In a recent study of the (p,p ) 90 Zr reaction [36], the authors find comparable cross sections for E1 and M1 resonances centered at excitation energies of 9.15 and 9.53 MeV, respectively. The former was interpreted as an E1 PDR, and the latter as an M1 spin-flip resonance with energy centroid and width following the systematics in RIPL-3 (the Reference Input Parameter Library at IAEA) [27] reasonably well.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Strength Functionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, the electromagnetic character of the increased strength for E γ > 4 MeV is also uncertain. In a recent study of the (p,p ) 90 Zr reaction [36], the authors find comparable cross sections for E1 and M1 resonances centered at excitation energies of 9.15 and 9.53 MeV, respectively. The former was interpreted as an E1 PDR, and the latter as an M1 spin-flip resonance with energy centroid and width following the systematics in RIPL-3 (the Reference Input Parameter Library at IAEA) [27] reasonably well.…”
Section: Gamma-ray Strength Functionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The accuracy is quite good and would make a strong constraint on model parameters and the prediction of neutron star properties, supernova explosion dynamics, and many other interesting astrophysical predictions. Beyond these results we note that the experimental data can also be applied for pygmy dipole resonance strength distribution [10,26], spin-M 1 strength distribution [27], fine-structure and level density of the E1 strength by using statistical methods [28], and for gamma-ray strength function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Experiments exploring Coulomb excitation, and polarized proton scattering off neutron-rich nuclei to extract the dipole polarizability and its relation to the slope parameter have been reported in a several publications in Refs. [129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148], just to cite a few of them. To date, there is a large variation in the measurements of α D in the order of 20-30%.…”
Section: Dipole Polarizabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%