2020
DOI: 10.1190/geo2019-0692.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Separation of simultaneous sources acquired with a high blending factor via coherence pass robust Radon operators

Abstract: We have developed an iterative method for simultaneous source separation (deblending) suitable for data acquired with a high blending factor. Our technique adopts the robust sparse Radon transform to define a coherence pass operator that is used in conjunction with the steepest-descent method to guarantee solutions that honor simultaneous source records. We find that an important improvement in convergence is attainable when the coherence pass projection is derived from a robust sparse Radon transform. This is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019) introduced a robust solving algorithm to transform the Huber‐norm minimization problems into the L2‐norm minimization problems, which can better preserve the signals and eliminate the outliers. Lin and Sacchi (2020) developed a robust, sparse Radon transform to separate blended data. Li and Sacchi (2021) established robust matching pursuit algorithms to retrieve sparse Radon domain coefficients for deblending seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) introduced a robust solving algorithm to transform the Huber‐norm minimization problems into the L2‐norm minimization problems, which can better preserve the signals and eliminate the outliers. Lin and Sacchi (2020) developed a robust, sparse Radon transform to separate blended data. Li and Sacchi (2021) established robust matching pursuit algorithms to retrieve sparse Radon domain coefficients for deblending seismic data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filtering‐based method is based on the assumption that the source with random excitation times is random noise after transforming the data into frequency–wavenumber (FK) domain or rearranging the data into common offset gathers. Median filtering (Chen et al., 2020b), radon transform (Lin & Sacchi, 2020) and FK filtering (Bahia et al., 2021) are common filtering‐based tools for deblending. The inversion‐based deblending method adopts an iterative way to attenuate the blending noise gradually (Ibrahim & Trad, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imposing a sparsity constraint, an inversion-based deblending algorithm utilizes sparse representations of signal components in auxiliary domains to retrieve desired signals, which is referred to as sparse inversion. A number of studies have shown high-quality deblending in various domains such as the Radon domain (Akerberg et al 2008;Moore 2010;Ibrahim and Sacchi 2013;Lin and Sacchi 2020), the Fourier domain (Abma et al 2015;Song et al 2019;Kumar et al 2020;Bahia et al 2020), the Curvelet domain (Zu et al, 2016) and the Seislet domain (Chen et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%