2017
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sepsis and Critical Illness Research Center investigators: protocols and standard operating procedures for a prospective cohort study of sepsis in critically ill surgical patients

Abstract: IntroductionSepsis is a common, costly and morbid cause of critical illness in trauma and surgical patients. Ongoing advances in sepsis resuscitation and critical care support strategies have led to improved in-hospital mortality. However, these patients now survive to enter state of chronic critical illness (CCI), persistent low-grade organ dysfunction and poor long-term outcomes driven by the persistent inflammation, immunosuppression and catabolism syndrome (PICS). The Sepsis and Critical Illness Research C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
85
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If not obtained within 96 hours, all patient data and biological samples were destroyed. Details of the study design with inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the clinical and laboratory standard operating procedure utilized were published . In brief, inclusion criteria included (1) age 18 years or older, (2) clinical diagnosis of sepsis defined by 2001 consensus guidelines, and (3) entrance into an electronic medical record sepsis screening and evidence‐based management protocols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If not obtained within 96 hours, all patient data and biological samples were destroyed. Details of the study design with inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the clinical and laboratory standard operating procedure utilized were published . In brief, inclusion criteria included (1) age 18 years or older, (2) clinical diagnosis of sepsis defined by 2001 consensus guidelines, and (3) entrance into an electronic medical record sepsis screening and evidence‐based management protocols.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance status was measured by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group/World Health Organization/Zubrod Performance Status that ranges from 0 to 5, with increasing score reflecting worse performance status: (0) asymptomatic (fully active); (1) Symptomatic but completely ambulatory (restricted in physically strenuous activity); (2) symptomatic, less than 50% of time in bed during the day (ambulatory and capable of all self‐care but unable to perform any work activities); (3) symptomatic, more than 50% of time in bed but not bedbound (capable of only limited self‐care); (4) bedbound (completely disabled, incapable of any self‐care); and (5) death . Baseline (ie, prehospitalization) performance status was based on patient/proxy‐reported 4‐week recall assessment as soon as possible after sepsis onset …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A prospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2018 at UF Health Shands Hospital, a 996-bed level 1 trauma and tertiary care center in Gainesville, Florida, USA (NCT: 02276417) [ 13 ]. The aim of the parent study was to examine the epidemiology, natural history, and long-term outcomes of surgical or trauma patients with sepsis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was carried out in two 24 bed surgical ICUs at the University of Florida (UF), Shands Hospital (Gainesville, FL; USA), and conducted by the UF SCIRC. A detailed description of the study design with specific inclusion and exclusion criteria as well as the clinical and laboratory standard operating procedure (SOPs) utilized has been published [28]. In brief, overall cohort inclusion criteria included: (1) age ≥ 18 years, (2) clinical diagnosis of sepsis as defined by 2001 international consensus guidelines, and (3) entrance into an electronic medical record sepsis screening and evidence-based ICU management protocol [16,23].…”
Section: Study Design Setting and Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%