2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.idcr.2019.e00563
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septic shock secondary to an acute necrotizing community-acquired pneumonia with bacteremia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Abstract: Highlights Necrotizing acute community-acquired pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa are rare. Second description of a septic shock secondary to a necrotizing CAP with bacteremia due to P. aeruginosa for which pulmonary origin was proven by bronchoalveolar lavage fluid on a patient who survived. Anti-pseudomonal monotherapy may be may be a better option for older patients … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…9 Most of these cases shared some similar features, including rapid progression and severe complications. 4,6,7 In this case, a 67-year-old male with no previous systemic disease. The CT after admission showed the dense consolidation site in the right lung, accompanying by mediastinal and right hilar lymphadenopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…9 Most of these cases shared some similar features, including rapid progression and severe complications. 4,6,7 In this case, a 67-year-old male with no previous systemic disease. The CT after admission showed the dense consolidation site in the right lung, accompanying by mediastinal and right hilar lymphadenopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 9 Most of these cases shared some similar features, including rapid progression and severe complications. 4 , 6 , 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, ATS/IDSA recommend that each acute care center should develop its own validated screening tools for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas based on local risk factors identified by the stewardship team. Not including the immunocompromised, as per the European guidelines (2011), ATD/IDSA (2019) recommends a non-anti-pseudomonal beta-lactam, plus or minus a macrolide or respiratory fluoroquinolone, as empiric therapy for CAP, not covering MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ]. In both immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients, empirical therapy has to be expanded beyond the core respiratory pathogens, such as MRSA and resistant gram-negative bacilli (including PA), when risk factors for drug-resistant organisms or opportunistic pathogens are present (such as previous hospitalization, exposure to a parenteral antibiotic in the last 90 days or previous cultures of MRSA or Pseudomonas from the airways) [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Хронические заболевания, тяжелые травмы, иммуносупрессия, социально-демографические показатели (мужской пол, возраст старше 65 лет и др.) являются факторами риска развития сепсиса и септического шока [35,55]. Многоцентровое двенадцатилетнее (1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006)(2007)(2008) исследование B. Zuber и соавт.…”
unclassified