1965
DOI: 10.1097/00010694-196505000-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Septic Tank Effluent Percolation Through Sands Under Laboratory Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This reduction in K bm /b nm from Week 2 to 20 can be attributed to either a decrease in hydraulic conductivity of the biomat, an increase in biomat thickness, or both. According to the literature (Jones and Taylor, 1965;Thomas et al, 1966;Bouma, 1975;Siegrist and Boyle, 1987;Tyler et al, 1991;Tyler and Converse, 1994) biomat development results from both the accumulation of suspended solids within soil pores and microbial growth as a result of microbiological activity. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that a decrease in permeability due to pore filling, as well as increase in biomat thickness is contributing to the overall increase in hydraulic resistance of the biomat zone.…”
Section: Normalized Hydraulic Conductivity Of the Biomat Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This reduction in K bm /b nm from Week 2 to 20 can be attributed to either a decrease in hydraulic conductivity of the biomat, an increase in biomat thickness, or both. According to the literature (Jones and Taylor, 1965;Thomas et al, 1966;Bouma, 1975;Siegrist and Boyle, 1987;Tyler et al, 1991;Tyler and Converse, 1994) biomat development results from both the accumulation of suspended solids within soil pores and microbial growth as a result of microbiological activity. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that a decrease in permeability due to pore filling, as well as increase in biomat thickness is contributing to the overall increase in hydraulic resistance of the biomat zone.…”
Section: Normalized Hydraulic Conductivity Of the Biomat Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanisms of biomat development are not fully understood, although several studies have been completed in the attempt to characterize biomat formation in subsurface PMBs. According to the literature, the development of a biomat layer at or just below the infiltrative surface seems to result from both the accumulation of suspended solids within soil pores and microbiological growth (Jones and Taylor, 1965;Thomas et al, 1966;Bouma, 1975;Siegrist and Boyle, 1987;Tyler et al, 1991;Tyler and Converse, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These stages have been referred to as phases of clogging. Although researchers have observed 2-4 phases, most have observed three (Jones and Taylor, 1965;Otis, 1984;Siegrist, 1987;Thomas et al, 1966). When three phases were observed, they generally consisted of (a) an initial gradual decline in infiltration rate, (b) a rapid decrease in infiltration rate, and (3) a stabilization of infiltration rate at a low long-term acceptance rate ( Figure 5).…”
Section: Effect Of Environmental Conditions On Soil Clogging Developmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For a good settling process "porous" soil layers are needed, preferably with adequate, maximum ground water levels (Jones & Tayler, 1965; Pradhan et al, 2011¸ Veres et al, 2015. The above listed advantageous conditions are not available in every country, but in most cases can be created as realistic or necessary solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%