1997
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/13.3.235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seq-Gen: an application for the Monte Carlo simulation of DNA sequence evolution along phylogenetic trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1,061
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,281 publications
(1,062 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
1,061
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Parametric replicate data sets were generated using Seq-gen (Rambaut and Grassly 1997) and analyzed sequentially by PAUP* to give the log likelihood ratio statistic under various scenarios. Results were tabulated using a Cprogram written by R.O.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parametric replicate data sets were generated using Seq-gen (Rambaut and Grassly 1997) and analyzed sequentially by PAUP* to give the log likelihood ratio statistic under various scenarios. Results were tabulated using a Cprogram written by R.O.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each genealogy represents a chromosomal segment of 5cM. Nucleotide sequences are then generated under Kimura's two-parameter model (Nei 1987) using the program seq-gen (Rambaut and Grassly 1997). Thus, each genealogy gives rise to a cluster of linked SNPs.…”
Section: Simulation 4: Effects Of Ld and Genetic Drift All Simulatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heuristic searches (200 replicates of RAS, holding 10 trees per step and with TBR branch swapping, keeping 10 trees of score P 1) were carried out on the original dataset in PAUP * with and without each of the four genera Austrodanthonia, Joycea, Notodanthonia and Rytidosperma constrained to be monophyletic. Based on the most appropriate model of nucleotide sequence evolution, as estimated in Modeltest 3.7 (Posada and Crandall, 1998) using only DNA characters, 100 new datasets were simulated in SeqGen (Rambaut and Grassly, 1997) and constrained and unconstrained analyses were carried out on each of the new matrices as above. The resulting length differences (constrained sim -unconstrained sim ) were plotted as a frequency diagram and used as a null distribution of length differences, against which the length difference (constrained obs -unconstrained obs ) was assessed.…”
Section: Parsimony Analyses and Monophyly Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%