1981
DOI: 10.1016/0191-8141(81)90041-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence and style of major post-nappe structures, Simplon—Pennine Alps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
57
2

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
57
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidently, this feature goes along with vertical shortening, given the flat-lying axial planes of the latestage mega-folds mentioned above. Note that the flat-lying axial planes of all these folds are in contrast with the steeply dipping axial planes of the classical backfolds, that are related to backthrusting along the Insubric line (Schmid et al 1987), such as the Vanzone antiform, formed later in respect to the Mischabel backfold (Milnes et al 1981 that no evidence for back-thrusting or normal faulting was found anywhere in the working area. While the interpretation of the present geometry can largely be explained by D3 nappe refolding, differences in P-T conditions found amongst the different tectonic units of the working area ) are unrelated to this folding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Evidently, this feature goes along with vertical shortening, given the flat-lying axial planes of the latestage mega-folds mentioned above. Note that the flat-lying axial planes of all these folds are in contrast with the steeply dipping axial planes of the classical backfolds, that are related to backthrusting along the Insubric line (Schmid et al 1987), such as the Vanzone antiform, formed later in respect to the Mischabel backfold (Milnes et al 1981 that no evidence for back-thrusting or normal faulting was found anywhere in the working area. While the interpretation of the present geometry can largely be explained by D3 nappe refolding, differences in P-T conditions found amongst the different tectonic units of the working area ) are unrelated to this folding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Classically, two phases of backfolding are known from the Penninic units of Western Switzerland and adjacent Aosta valley (e.g. Milnes et al 1981). During a first phase of backfolding (D3) the Mischabel backfold, characterized by a flat-lying axial plane, develops.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ar, Rb/Sr and oxygen stable isotopes). Sm, Simplon mylonites; S1/2, foliation related to the D1 and D2 deformation phases [Milnes et al, 1981]; Penninic M. cover, Penninic Mesozoic cover; Camug.-Monc., CamugheraMoncucco unit. MC492, MC497, and MC498 come from boulders in the Isorno River.…”
Section: Methods and Sample Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinematic indicators from both the ductile and brittle components consistently show a top down to the SW shear sense [Mancktelow, 1985[Mancktelow, , 1987[Mancktelow, , 1990Grosjean et al, 2004]. In contrast, older structures are generally well preserved in the hanging wall, showing overprinting relationships between several deformation phases that correspond well in their orientation and style to the four regional phases, D1 to D4 [Milnes et al, 1981]. These ductile structures are nonpervasively overprinted by brittle faults.…”
Section: Simplon Fault Zonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation