2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.634121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-based Network Completion Reveals the Integrality of Missing Reactions in Metabolic Networks

Abstract: Background: Genome-scale draft metabolic networks are incomplete, even for well studied organisms. Results: Reactions selected by minimizing flux through unlikely reactions resulted in networks of superior quality. Conclusion: Genome-scale models have many network completion solutions but require the addition of unsupported reactions to be functional. Significance: Metabolic networks guide synthetic biology efforts, and the quality of networks determines their predictive power.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even after those additions an average of one-third of the reactions in each model were still blocked, meaning that there were still enough reactions missing in the network to preclude metabolic flux through those reactions [25, 26]. In addition, the number of reactions that can partake in a gap filling solution is vast (3270 in the case of E. coli ), and the sets of reactions generated by different gap filling algorithms may have little or no overlap with each other [27]. Clearly, a more complete identification and annotation of metabolic reactions would be preferable to the addition of dozens of poorly supported reactions just to patch the holes in the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even after those additions an average of one-third of the reactions in each model were still blocked, meaning that there were still enough reactions missing in the network to preclude metabolic flux through those reactions [25, 26]. In addition, the number of reactions that can partake in a gap filling solution is vast (3270 in the case of E. coli ), and the sets of reactions generated by different gap filling algorithms may have little or no overlap with each other [27]. Clearly, a more complete identification and annotation of metabolic reactions would be preferable to the addition of dozens of poorly supported reactions just to patch the holes in the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All methods that use various kinds of omics data to fill the gaps of a metabolic model are in the third group, e.g. , Sequence-based (45) and Likelihood-based (46) methods, Mirage (47), and GAUGE (26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also note that, one way to improve the GAUGE predictions is to use BLAST-weighted dataset of reactions like strategies used recently 18 19 . This way, the presence of unrelated or orphan reactions may be reduced in possible solutions of GAUGE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is also true about 13 C labeling data or metabolomics data which are required for OMNI 14 and minimal extension 15 methods, respectively. The four last methods in Table 1 usually take a draft metabolic network that cannot produce biomass, and try to add minimum number of reactions to the model, such that biomass producing reaction can carry flux 16 17 18 19 . In the present study we aim to use gene expression data for finding the gaps.…”
Section: Gap Analysis: Gap Finding and Gap Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%