1998
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence comparisons using multiple sequences detect three times as many remote homologues as pairwise methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
375
5
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 486 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
17
375
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We also identified this domain in a cytoplasmic protein of unknown function, NDP52 (34). All EXPECT scores are well below the significance threshold of 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 as described by Park et al (35). A sequence alignment of all domains revealed that this novel domain is characterized by the highly conserved motif DWXGX 3 VGX 6 YX 4 W and a second motif, GX 3 PF (Fig.…”
Section: Skip Translocates To the Plasma Membrane Of Egf-orsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We also identified this domain in a cytoplasmic protein of unknown function, NDP52 (34). All EXPECT scores are well below the significance threshold of 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ6 as described by Park et al (35). A sequence alignment of all domains revealed that this novel domain is characterized by the highly conserved motif DWXGX 3 VGX 6 YX 4 W and a second motif, GX 3 PF (Fig.…”
Section: Skip Translocates To the Plasma Membrane Of Egf-orsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For example, the relative performance of SVM-Fisher and SAM agrees with the results given in Jaakkola et al, 10 as does the relative performance of SAM and PSI-BLAST with the results given in Park et al 28 and the relative performance of SVM-I-sites and SVM-pairwise given in Hou et al 16 One surprise is the magnitude of the difference between SVM-pairwise and the 2 methods, SVM-Fisher and SAM, that directly or indirectly utilize SAM-T99 model. It is reported in Liao and Noble 11 that SVM-pairwise significantly outperforms these 2 methods, which is not the case in this work.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Profile/HMM/PSSM methods are more sensitive than single-sequence comparison methods because they summarize the evolutionary history of a family, identifying more and less conserved positions within the protein [39]. Recently, profile/HMM/PSSM-based methods have been extended to provide profile-profile based comparisons [19•,40-43].…”
Section: Progress In Sequence Similarity Searchingmentioning
confidence: 99%