2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.checat.2021.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence control of metals in MOF by coordination number precoding for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metal-mixing is a common but effective strategy to enhance performances by combining both merits of the homometallic analogies. 20,31,123 Schroder and his colleagues 31 constructed a heterometallic 1D MFM-300(Al 0.67 Cr 0.33 ) for SO 2 separation from CO 2 , which was compared in parallel to its homometallic MFM-300(Al) and MFM-300(Cr). According to the experimental results, MFM-300(Al) showed both stronger adsorption toward SO 2 and CO 2 but at the compromise of lower SO 2 /CO 2 selectivity than MFM-300(Cr).…”
Section: Gas Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metal-mixing is a common but effective strategy to enhance performances by combining both merits of the homometallic analogies. 20,31,123 Schroder and his colleagues 31 constructed a heterometallic 1D MFM-300(Al 0.67 Cr 0.33 ) for SO 2 separation from CO 2 , which was compared in parallel to its homometallic MFM-300(Al) and MFM-300(Cr). According to the experimental results, MFM-300(Al) showed both stronger adsorption toward SO 2 and CO 2 but at the compromise of lower SO 2 /CO 2 selectivity than MFM-300(Cr).…”
Section: Gas Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11] In most cases, the metal ions or metallic secondary building units (SBUs) are considered as discrete zero-dimensional (0D) nodes that are further linked by organic ligands for the construction of frameworks. [12][13][14][15] Distinctly, innite SBUs (ISBUs) like onedimensional (1D) chains, [16][17][18] two-dimensional (2D) sheets, [19][20][21] and even three-dimensional (3D) nets [22][23][24] have also emerged in MOFs and been rapidly developed recently. Consequently, MOFs can also be categorized into OD, 1D, 2D, and 3D subclasses according to the ISBU types (Scheme 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To accomplish the understanding of the genuine structure‐activity correlation, it is essential to study in‐depth the interaction between substrate materials and active species. The nature of the reconstructed species is influenced by the composition, structure, porosity, crystallinity, and other conditions of the substrate [45–46] . Meanwhile, the substrate materials may influence the OER performance by modulating the adsorption/desorption capacity of the active species with the reaction intermediates through electron transfer and interfacial interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15] Transplanting dynamic motifs such as organic ligands with moving moieties (e.g., rotary, vibrational, or elastic elements) into chemically rigid frameworks to derive artificial molecular machinery has been a transformative approach for designing novel smart materials. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] As compared to conventional luminescent MOFs, the presence of these molecular machinery elements provides attentional and unprecedented responsiveness. Aggregation-induced emission (AIE) fluorogens (AIEgens) are a novel class of organic fluorophores, whose emission is largely associated with their twisted molecular geometry and degree of intramolecular motions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%