2015
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m114.586636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-dependent Internalization of Aggregating Peptides

Abstract: Background: Prionoid propagation requires cell internalization of aggregated polypeptides. Results: Aggregates of different sequence are internalized through different endocytic pathways. Only phagocytosed aggregates (Ͼ1 m) elicit an HSF1-dependent proteostatic response. Conclusion: Proteostatic response upon aggregate internalization differs markedly depending on the sequence. Significance: The characterization of mechanisms of cell penetration is fundamental for the understanding of aggregate transmission in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This supports the view that toxicity of amyloidogenic proteins is tightly linked to assembly size and structure. It has previously been reported that the uptake of aggregating amyloid proteins is sequence specific , and the cellular response to these proteins is thought to be highly dependent on aggregation propensity, size and charge. As the sequences of both control peptides have led to a higher propensity to aggregate than wild‐type Aβ1‐42, confirmed by structural characterisation presented above, the reported mechanisms of internalisation, which include dynamin‐mediated endocytosis , may not be possible with the control peptides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This supports the view that toxicity of amyloidogenic proteins is tightly linked to assembly size and structure. It has previously been reported that the uptake of aggregating amyloid proteins is sequence specific , and the cellular response to these proteins is thought to be highly dependent on aggregation propensity, size and charge. As the sequences of both control peptides have led to a higher propensity to aggregate than wild‐type Aβ1‐42, confirmed by structural characterisation presented above, the reported mechanisms of internalisation, which include dynamin‐mediated endocytosis , may not be possible with the control peptides.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other pathways for the internalization of amyloidogenic proteins have been discussed. Synthetic peptide aggregates of sizes Ͻ500 nm were taken up into HEK cells by nonspecific endocytosis, whereas larger aggregates were internalized by a mechanism similar to phagocytosis (35). Tau aggregates can be internalized via micropinocytosis, mediated by glycosaminoglycans (36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proportion of aggregation prone residues (APRprop(%)) in a protein sequence was computed using Eq. (2).…”
Section: Prediction Of Aggregation Prone Regions (Aprs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native conformations of proteins are maintained by a balance between entropy and enthalpy under physiological conditions by avoiding potential intermediates and metastable states, which are prone to misfolding and aggregation. Proteostasis is therefore controlled in each cell by strict regulation of biogenesis, folding (chaperone assisted or otherwise), trafficking and degradation . Even slight disturbances in this regulation can lead to accumulation of misfolded protein aggregates and consequently result in diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%