2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.103990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence determinants of human-cell entry identified in ACE2-independent bat sarbecoviruses: A combined laboratory and computational network science approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
34
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously shown that a small number of clade 2 RBDs, such as As6526 and Rs4081, also exhibit protease-mediated, ACE2-independent entry, and similar phenotypes have been described for other bat coronaviruses [ 1 , 35 ]. Analogous to Khosta 1, the completely ACE2-independent RBD clade 2 sarbecovirus, Rs4081, also efficiently infects Huh-7 cells in the presence of trypsin [ 36 ]. Because not all of the RBD clade 2 and 3 sarbecoviruses exhibit trypsin-dependent entry in our comparative assays with chimeric spikes, these findings collectively suggest that some coronaviruses may infect human cells through a presently unknown receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that a small number of clade 2 RBDs, such as As6526 and Rs4081, also exhibit protease-mediated, ACE2-independent entry, and similar phenotypes have been described for other bat coronaviruses [ 1 , 35 ]. Analogous to Khosta 1, the completely ACE2-independent RBD clade 2 sarbecovirus, Rs4081, also efficiently infects Huh-7 cells in the presence of trypsin [ 36 ]. Because not all of the RBD clade 2 and 3 sarbecoviruses exhibit trypsin-dependent entry in our comparative assays with chimeric spikes, these findings collectively suggest that some coronaviruses may infect human cells through a presently unknown receptor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the spike protein of some bat coronaviruses including isolates RaTG13 and RmYN02 were shown to be unable to bind cognate bat ACE2 receptors (27,28), suggesting that compatibility between spike and receptor may not be necessary for virus maintenance in bats. The ability to bind human ACE2 has been mapped to residues within the RBD that are deleted or mutated in the majority of bat coronaviruses (26,(29)(30)(31). Furthermore, receptor-independent entry of coronaviruses has been described for murine hepatitis virus (32), MERS-CoV (33), and SARS-CoV-2 (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we showed that viral-like particles pseudotyped with S from some of the clade 2 viruses could infect human cells in the presence of trypsin, demonstrating that clade 2 viruses may also pose a risk of cross-species transmission ( 19 , 20 ). Although viral pseudotypes are generally a suitable model of true viral cell entry, there have been discrepancies between pseudotype and viral replication results for other bat sarbecoviruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While clade 2 viruses were the first sarbecoviruses discovered in bats, initial attempts to isolate these viruses from field samples or propagate clade 2 viruses from reverse genetics systems were unsuccessful ( 1 , 6 , 10 , 19 , 21 ). To date, viruses from clades 2, 3, and 4 have only been assessed by protein-protein binding assays (measuring affinity of purified spike protein fragments for purified receptor binding fragments) or pseudotyped systems due to lack of live virus growth ( 15 , 19 to 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%