2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-006-6262-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence Polymorphism Discovery in Wheat Microsatellite Flanking Regions using Pyrophosphate Sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Significant resources have been devoted to the development of SNPs as high‐throughput markers and also to SNP discovery. Extensive SNP discovery projects have been undertaken in many species, including humans (Sachidanandam et al ., 2001), model species such as Arabidopsis thaliana (Jander et al ., 2002) and Drosophila melanogaster (Hoskins et al ., 2001), and in crop plants, such as barley (Rostoks et al ., 2005a), maize (Ching et al ., 2002), rice (Shen et al ., 2004; McNally et al ., 2006), soybean (Zhu et al ., 2003) and wheat (Ablett et al ., 2006; Ravel et al ., 2006). In species in which no genome sequence is available, large‐scale SNP discovery in genes has generally relied on sequence information in libraries of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for either direct discovery (Somers et al ., 2003; Bundock et al ., 2006) or as the basis for primer design for re‐sequencing (Rostoks et al ., 2005b; Choi et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significant resources have been devoted to the development of SNPs as high‐throughput markers and also to SNP discovery. Extensive SNP discovery projects have been undertaken in many species, including humans (Sachidanandam et al ., 2001), model species such as Arabidopsis thaliana (Jander et al ., 2002) and Drosophila melanogaster (Hoskins et al ., 2001), and in crop plants, such as barley (Rostoks et al ., 2005a), maize (Ching et al ., 2002), rice (Shen et al ., 2004; McNally et al ., 2006), soybean (Zhu et al ., 2003) and wheat (Ablett et al ., 2006; Ravel et al ., 2006). In species in which no genome sequence is available, large‐scale SNP discovery in genes has generally relied on sequence information in libraries of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) for either direct discovery (Somers et al ., 2003; Bundock et al ., 2006) or as the basis for primer design for re‐sequencing (Rostoks et al ., 2005b; Choi et al ., 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several diagnostic applications across many organisms have been developed using this method. In bread wheat pyrosequencing is used for instance to genotype SNPs (Huang and Röder 2005;Ablett et al 2006) or to carry out quantitative transcriptome profilings (Salentijn et al 2009). Also, 454 shotgun sequencing is a pyrosequencing-based approach which can be used for genome sequencing and, subsequently, to identify SNPs.…”
Section: Pyrosequencing and Breeding Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of the smallest unit of DNA sequence difference, the single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), is currently the preferred approach because of the low cost and high level of automation of the assays (Sobrino et al 2005). Earlier genetic markers used in cereals are able to be converted to SNP assays (Ablett et al 2006;Bundock et al 2006) to take advantage of these technologies.…”
Section: High-throughput Low-cost Genomic Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%