1968
DOI: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1968.tb00034.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence-State Coding for Digital Transmission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since we consider fixed length codes the size of t,he code is determined by the smallest set belonging to some state in the model. Franaszek [3] noted that if we take a subset of all states in the model and require the codewords to start and end in states of this subset then an optimum subset exists. This subset is known as the set of principal states and Franaszek descrihed an algorithm to search for these principal states.…”
Section: On T H E Principal State Methods For Rtjnlength Limited Sequementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since we consider fixed length codes the size of t,he code is determined by the smallest set belonging to some state in the model. Franaszek [3] noted that if we take a subset of all states in the model and require the codewords to start and end in states of this subset then an optimum subset exists. This subset is known as the set of principal states and Franaszek descrihed an algorithm to search for these principal states.…”
Section: On T H E Principal State Methods For Rtjnlength Limited Sequementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many code construction method by which we can construct an encoder which encodes binary unconstrained sequences into binary sequences satisfying the constraint. For example, see [6], [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each class of block-type-decodable encoders, it can be shown that there exists an ( )-encoder in class if and only if there exists such an encoder which is a subgraph of (in particular, this holds when is the Shannon cover) [11]. Thus, the problem of designing block-type-decodable encoders is equivalent to choosing a subgraph of , in particular, a subset of , called a set of principal states (this terminology goes back to Franaszek [2] who used it only for the class of deterministic encoders). It follows that and We do not know of a formula for as simple as those above, but, as with and , it is a function of only an arbitrary irreducible, deterministic presentation of the constraint, such as the Shannon cover.…”
Section: Block-type-decodable Encodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this problem can be considerably more tractable for the class of deterministic encoders; these are finite-state encoders with deterministic output labeling. While deterministic encoders do not necessarily have good error propagation properties, it is well known that for RLL( ) constraints, the optimal rates of deterministic and block-decodable encoders coincide for every block length [2], [3], [5].…”
Section: Block-type-decodable Encodersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation