I have had the pleasure of practicing biology and technology development for the past 35 yearssfirst at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) for 3 years, then at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) for 22 years, subsequently at the University of Washington (UW) for 8 years, and finally at the Institute for Systems Biology (ISB) for the past 2 years. In each case, my geographical transitions were prompted by exciting new opportunities and evolving visions of how biology should be practiced. The technology developments I have been associated with over this period helped to catalyze two emerging paradigm changes in biology: systems biology and predictive/preventive medicine. Several points should be stressed regarding biology and technology. First, technology is all about deciphering biological information, and that information is of three general types: (1) the digital information of DNA; (2) the three-dimensional information of proteins, the molecular machines of life; and (3) the four-dimensional (time-variant) information of biological systems operating across developmental and/or physiological time spans. Second, biology should be the driver for new technologies. Where barriers to deciphering biological information exist, they need to be lifted by appropriate technologies. Third, technology includes new instrumentation (e.g., the automated DNA sequencer) as well as new strategies (e.g., the oligonucleotide ligase assay, or OLA). Finally, challenging new technologies often require the integration of expertise from biology, chemistry, computer science, engineering, mathematics, and physics. Especially important is the development and integration of computational tools for capturing, storing, and analyzing biological information.Throughout out my career, I have been associated with outstanding colleagues (Table 1), and it is to them that much of the credit must go for our accomplishments. It is with considerable pride that I note many of my former colleagues are today's technology leaders.Over my career, there have been six successive evolutionary stages to my thinking about biology and technology (Table 2). I will discuss each of these in turn.