2011
DOI: 10.1021/tx100275t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence Tagging Reveals Unexpected Modifications in Toxicoproteomics

Abstract: Toxicoproteomic samples are rich in posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of proteins. Identifying these modifications via standard database searching can incur significant performance penalties. Here we describe the latest developments in TagRecon, an algorithm that leverages inferred sequence tags to identify modified peptides in toxicoproteomic data sets. TagRecon identifies known modifications more effectively than the MyriMatch database search engine. TagRecon outperformed state of the art software in re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, DirecTag-TagRecon software interrogated the subset of FASTA proteins for unanticipated PTMs (11). DirecTag generated the 50 best tags of three amino acids from each MS/MS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, DirecTag-TagRecon software interrogated the subset of FASTA proteins for unanticipated PTMs (11). DirecTag generated the 50 best tags of three amino acids from each MS/MS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IDPicker version 3.0 filtered the resulting peptide identifications at 2% FDR, as described above. Detected PTMs were attested following previously published guidelines (11). Relative expression of protein PTMs (at sample level) between two groups was performed using peptide intensities as described previously (24) and then displayed as percent difference between study days.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family would be even larger if the roster included algorithms that employ very different strategies than SEQUEST and yet compute XCorr scores [42]. SEQUEST has stood the test of time for two main reasons; cross-correlation has demonstrated itself to be an excellent discriminator in the presence of noise peaks, and a variety of fully automated processing pipelines can work from SEQUEST identifications to simplify determining which spectra were confidently identified and to assemble protein inferences from the peptide-spectrum matches.…”
Section: Mapping the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate SRM assay development we built a substantial library of MS/MS spectra assigned with high confidence to tryptic peptides arising from a large pool of rat liver samples. The MS/MS spectral library data set has been deposited in PeptideAtlas and has additionally already been exploited by additional studies aimed at elucidating unanticipated post translational modifications relating to drug toxicology (50). Specific SRM assays for 48 biomarker candidates were developed via iterative rounds of optimization and quality control.…”
Section: Targeted Measurement Of a Putative Hepatotoxicity Biomarker mentioning
confidence: 99%