2001
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.10103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequence variation and physical state of human papillomavirus type 16 cervical cancer isolates from Australia and New Caledonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the prevalence of episomal HPV diverged between the different HPV types. For HPV types 16 and 18, additional episomal HPV was found in 55% and 4% of the samples, respectively, which is in accordance with previous findings (7,18,21,48). For HPV types 31 and 33, data on HPV integration are limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, the prevalence of episomal HPV diverged between the different HPV types. For HPV types 16 and 18, additional episomal HPV was found in 55% and 4% of the samples, respectively, which is in accordance with previous findings (7,18,21,48). For HPV types 31 and 33, data on HPV integration are limited.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A substantial proportion of the changes found in HPV16 E6 were located in the amino half of the protein, which represents the binding region of the cellular protein E6-AP and has a role in both cell-mediated and humoral host immune responses (26,40,41). Moreover, a recent report indicates that variations in codons 14 and 27 substantially altered the E6 antigenic index and may affect interactions with E6-AP (66). This provides biochemical support for selection at HPV16 E6 aa 14.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…When designing primers, the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database was interrogated to target regions of homology across all registered HPV16 and HPV18 variants. We also reviewed reports identifying polymorphisms in the HPV16 and HPV18 E2 genes with a view to ensuring that disruption of E2 could not be explained by the failure of primer binding due to sequence variation (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%