2009
DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2009.11868468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequences of service points and the misperception of momentum in elite tennis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, many studies find no significant change in performance following a precipitating event. Several scholars have failed to find evidence of PM in tennis when examining the outcome of sets (Silva et al, 1988;Malueg and Yates, 2010) and when examining the sequences of service points (O'Donoghue and Brown, 2009). Additionally, Parsons and Rohde (2015) and Gauriot and Page (2018) find no support for the existence of PM in football.…”
Section: Related Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, many studies find no significant change in performance following a precipitating event. Several scholars have failed to find evidence of PM in tennis when examining the outcome of sets (Silva et al, 1988;Malueg and Yates, 2010) and when examining the sequences of service points (O'Donoghue and Brown, 2009). Additionally, Parsons and Rohde (2015) and Gauriot and Page (2018) find no support for the existence of PM in football.…”
Section: Related Empirical Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, momentum is perceived to be important in tennis and it is almost impossible to watch a tennis match on television without hearing expert commentators referring to momentum. As with other sports, tennis research has also provided mixed evidence as to whether point outcomes are independent of previous point outcomes ( Klaassen and Magnus, 2001;O'Donoghue and Brown, 2009). Klaassen and Magnus (2001) found that winning the previous point increased the probability of winning the current point by 0.3% in men's singles and 0.5% in women's singles at Wimbledon (1992-5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dominance of the serve and players alternating service games make it unlikely that long sequences of points of the same outcome will be observed in professional tennis. Therefore, momentum research in tennis has considered serving and receiving performance separately (O'Donoghue and Brown, 2009). The disadvantage of such an approach is that sequences of points might include pairs of consecutive service points that are not even played within the same service game.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of serve and return performance in four Grand Slams have been widely addressed in previous studies (Hizan et al, 2014;O'Donoghue & Brown, 2009;O'Donoghue & Brown, 2008;Reid & Morris, 2013;Whiteside & Reid, 2016b) and been treated as the two most important performance variables in tennis match (Gillet et al, 2009;Hizan et al, 2011;Unierzyski & Wieczorek, 2004). Consistent with former studies (Gillet et al, 2009;Hizan et al, 2011), the results indicated that in all Grand Slams, female players had an optimal first serve in percentage of round 60% and still used a "fast-weak" serving strategies.…”
Section: Serve and Return Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hizan et al, 2015;Ma et al, 2013;Moss & O'Donoghue, 2015;O'Donoghue, 2012;O'Donoghue & Brown, 2009;O'Donoghue & Ingram, 2001;Reid et al, 2016; Whiteside & Reid, 2016b).The difference of court surfaces in four Grand Slams determines that players adjust their strategies on a slam basis (O'Donoghue & Ingram, 2001) and it is necessary to understand how they respond accordingly in different events. Few studies have made thoroughly an examination of how professional female players performed in four Grand Slam events (O'Donoghue & Ingram, 2001; O'Donoghue & Brown, 2008), not to mention how they performed in different court surfaces (Gillet et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%