Protein is an essential component for life, and its synthesis is mediated by codons in any organisms on earth. While some codons encode the same amino acid, their usage is often highly biased. There are many factors that can cause the bias, but a potential effect of mononucleotide repeats, which are known to be highly mutable, on codon usage and codon pair preference is largely unknown. In this study we performed a genomic survey on the relationship between mononucleotide repeats and codon pair bias in 53 bacteria, 68 archaea, and 13 eukaryotes. By distinguishing the codon pair bias from the codon usage bias, four general patterns were revealed: strong avoidance of five or six mononucleotide repeats in codon pairs; lower observed/expected (o/e) ratio for codon pairs with C or G repeats (C/G pairs) than that with A or T repeats (A/T pairs); a negative correlation between genomic GC contents and the o/e ratios, particularly for C/G pairs; and avoidance of C/G pairs in highly conserved genes. These results support natural selection against long mononucleotide repeats, which could induce frameshift mutations in coding sequences. The fact that these patterns are found in all kingdoms of life suggests that this is a general phenomenon in living organisms. Thus, long mononucleotide repeats may play an important role in base composition and genetic stability of a gene and gene functions.A MONG the many components of life, protein is most essential because living organisms use proteins not only for body structuring but also for its functioning. After the discovery of the genetic code for protein biosynthesis (Crick et al. 1961), redundancy in the genetic code attracted great attention. Highly biased use of synonymous codons is one of them, and the codon usage bias is common not only among species but also within species (Grosjean and Fiers 1982;Akashi 2001). Previous studies showed that codon usage bias is linked to several factors, such as efficiency and accuracy of translation (Robinson et al. 1984;Bulmer 1991;Akashi 1994;Plotkin et al. 2004), compositional bias (Muto and Osawa 1987;McLean et al. 1998), and genome size or other nonselective forces (Lawrence and Ochman 1998;dos Reis et al. 2004).One additional factor is the sequence environment. It is known that nucleotides surrounding a codon can influence the codon usage preference, called contextdependent codon bias (Yarus and Folley 1985). The context-dependent codon bias affects the efficiency and accuracy of translation (Taniguchi and Weissmann 1978;Irwin et al. 1995) and the suppression of both premature stop codons and missense codons (Bossi and Ruth 1980;Murgola et al. 1984). Reflecting the context-dependent codon bias, a strong codon pair bias is detected in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes (Gutman and Hatfield 1989;Buchan et al. 2006;Tats et al. 2008). It has been suggested that codon pair preference is influenced by all three nucleotides of the ribosomal A-site codon and the third nucleotide of the P-site codon (Buchan et al. 2006). Therefore,...