2022
DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2022.2076625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequencing and analysis of the complete mitochondrial genome of Gymnogobius laevis

Abstract: Gymnogobius laevis (Steindachner, 1879) is a small, benthic freshwater fish. In a previous study, it was reported as a rare resident in Heilongjiang Province. In this study, the mitochondrial genome of G. laevis was sequenced. It is 16,519 base pairs (bp) in length and contains 13 protein-coding genes, two ribosomal RNA genes (12S rRNA and 16S rRNA), 22 transfer RNA genes (tRNA), and two non-coding control regions. The A + T content is 55.71% in the G. laevis … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2016 ); G. isaza LC739183 (this study); G. laevis MW049117 (Peng et al. 2022 ); G. petschiliensis MG018480 (Gong et al. 2017 ); G. urotaenia KT601093 (unpublished); Luciogobius elongatus MH682216, L. grandis MH682216 (Jun et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 2016 ); G. isaza LC739183 (this study); G. laevis MW049117 (Peng et al. 2022 ); G. petschiliensis MG018480 (Gong et al. 2017 ); G. urotaenia KT601093 (unpublished); Luciogobius elongatus MH682216, L. grandis MH682216 (Jun et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“… 2017 ; Peng et al. 2022 ). This represents invaluable genetic resources for future eDNA studies, enabling the distinction of G. isaza from its closely related species inhabiting the same water system (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2016 ) and Gymnogobius laevis (Peng et al. 2022 ) were used as outgroups to root the tree. JTT + G + I + F was selected as the optimal evolutionary model for phylogenetic analysis due to the lowest Bayesian information standard scores (BIC) (Jones et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%