“…First, the complete protein libraries annotated from eleven ochrophyte genomes (the diatoms Phaeodactylum tricornutum (Bowler et al, 2008), Thalassiosira pseudonana (Armbrust et al, 2004), Thalassiosira oceanica (Lommer et al, 2012), Fistulifera solaris (Tanaka et al, 2015b), Fragilariopsis cylindrus, Synedra acus (Galachyants et al, 2015), and Pseudonitzschia multiseries ; the pelagophyte Aureococcus anophagef ferens (Gobler et al, 2011); the eustigmatophytes Nannochloropsis gaditana and Nannochloropsis salina (Radakovits et al, 2013; Wang et al, 2014); and the kelp Ectocarpus siliculosus (Cock et al, 2010); Table S1- sheet 1 [Dorrell et al, 2016]), were screened using the ochrophyte plastid-targeting predictors ASAFind (Gruber et al, 2015) (used in conjunction with SignalP version 3.0 (Bendtsen et al, 2004); Table S2 [Dorrell et al, 2016]) and HECTAR (Gschloessl et al, 2008) (integrated into a Galaxy (Afgan et al, 2016) instance available at http://webtools.sb-roscoff.fr; Table S3 [Dorrell et al, 2016]). All proteins that were deemed to possess plastid-targeting sequences (regardless of the confidence score applied by ASAFind [Gruber et al, 2015]) were retained for further inspection.…”