2005
DOI: 10.1145/1071596.1071600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequent and hypersequent calculi for abelian and łukasiewicz logics

Abstract: We present two embeddings of Lukasiewicz logic L into Meyer and Slaney's Abelian logic A, the logic of lattice-ordered Abelian groups. We give new analytic proof systems for A and use the embeddings to derive corresponding systems for L. These include hypersequent calculi, terminating hypersequent calculi, co-NP labeled sequent calculi, and unlabeled sequent calculi.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…P 3 ) can be captured by multiple-conclusion (hyper)sequent calculi, as in the case of weak excluded middle in Gentzen LK calculus for classical logic or of Łukasiewicz axiom (see Example 7.4) in the hypersequent calculus for Łukasiewicz logic in [10], we conjecture that the expressive power of single-conclusion sequent (resp. hypersequent) structural rules is limited to N 2 (resp.…”
Section: Cut Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…P 3 ) can be captured by multiple-conclusion (hyper)sequent calculi, as in the case of weak excluded middle in Gentzen LK calculus for classical logic or of Łukasiewicz axiom (see Example 7.4) in the hypersequent calculus for Łukasiewicz logic in [10], we conjecture that the expressive power of single-conclusion sequent (resp. hypersequent) structural rules is limited to N 2 (resp.…”
Section: Cut Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Therefore, though the calculi of [14] admit cut-elimination, their rules, which we extracted out of P 3 and N 3 axioms, are not "good" enough to ensure conservativity. This contrasts with the result for N 2 axioms (and P 3 ones, if our conjecture is true, cf.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim to continue the conquer further faced a serious obstacle: As shown in [3], "strong" cut-elimination for a logical system L implies that the class of algebras corresponding to L is closed under completions, whereas certain logics beyond P 3 do not admit closure under completions. Typical examples are Abelian logic AL [15,16]-the logic corresponding to compact closed categories-and infinite-valued Lukasiewicz logic L, although possessing cut-free hypersequent calculi, see [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations