2000
DOI: 10.1080/016909600386101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
74
0
4

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
3
74
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas in the PDP models of Jordan (1990) and Dell and colleagues (Dell et al, 1993), articulation is by design initiated when the features of the first segment have become activated, adopting articulatory buffering would seem to be compatible with NST, although Santiago et al (2000) explicitly argued against it. Articulation may then be initiated when the buffer contains a phonological word or more rather than the initial segment or syllable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas in the PDP models of Jordan (1990) and Dell and colleagues (Dell et al, 1993), articulation is by design initiated when the features of the first segment have become activated, adopting articulatory buffering would seem to be compatible with NST, although Santiago et al (2000) explicitly argued against it. Articulation may then be initiated when the buffer contains a phonological word or more rather than the initial segment or syllable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, MacKay's (1987;Santiago et al, 2000) NST assumes that words are planned via a tree traversal process that operates in a sequential top-down and leftto-right fashion. The initial syllable of a word is planned before its non-initial syllables, and within a syllable initial segments are planned before non-initial segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fact that words with more syllables have longer speech onset latencies than words with fewer syllables when other factors, such as number of segments or word frequency are controlled for does not pose a problem for this proposal. These effects of word length can be explained by assuming that the phonological rather than the phonetic encoding of a phonological word must be completed before speech onset (see Eriksen, Pollack, & Montague, 1970;Klapp, Anderson, & Berrian, 1973;Meyer et al, 2003;Santiago, MacKay, Palma, & Rho, 2000, but see also Roelofs, 2002;Santiago, MacKay, & Palma, 2002;Wheeldon & Lahiri, 1997). Further research is needed to investigate which planning unit is used in a given speech context and what factors release the articulation initiation.…”
Section: Disyllabic Pseudo-words With Frequency Manipulated Syllablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Santiago, MacKay, Palma, and Rho (2000) contrasted the predictions of two types of theory. According to MacKay's (1987) Node Structure theory, henceforth NST, syllables and their internal structure are planned via a tree traversal process that operates in a top-down and left-to-right fashion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
Santiago, MacKay, Palma, and Rho (2000) report two picture naming experiments examining the role of syllable onset complexity and number of syllables in spoken word production. Experiment 1 showed that naming latencies are longer for words with two syllables (e.g., demon) than one syllable (e.g., duck), and longer for words beginning with a consonant cluster (e.g., drill) than a single consonant (e.g., duck).
…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%