1996
DOI: 10.3892/ijo.9.5.971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential administration of interleukin-3 and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor following intensified, accelerated CEE (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, etoposide) chemotherapy in patients with solid tumors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because there are few data regarding how long hematopoietic stem cells spend in the quiescent state, two alternative values of 4 days (p"1/96 hr\) or 14 days (p"1/336 hr\) are modeled (Killmann, 1968;Lord, 1997;Papayannopoulou et al, 2000). The parameter f is estimated to be 0.4 based on a PI of 30% and an SPF of 12% (Danova et al, 1996). Because TAM and HER speci"cally target tumor cells, and because myelosuppression is not a major toxicity for either drug, it is assumed that these two drugs do not have cytostatic e!ects on the bone marrow.…”
Section: Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because there are few data regarding how long hematopoietic stem cells spend in the quiescent state, two alternative values of 4 days (p"1/96 hr\) or 14 days (p"1/336 hr\) are modeled (Killmann, 1968;Lord, 1997;Papayannopoulou et al, 2000). The parameter f is estimated to be 0.4 based on a PI of 30% and an SPF of 12% (Danova et al, 1996). Because TAM and HER speci"cally target tumor cells, and because myelosuppression is not a major toxicity for either drug, it is assumed that these two drugs do not have cytostatic e!ects on the bone marrow.…”
Section: Toxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%