2008 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory 2008
DOI: 10.1109/isit.2008.4595159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential change detection based on universal compression algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the test of versus . If we denote , the sample expectation of the data observed, , can be expressed as (17) where . Here the stopping time defined by sequential universal test is: (18) By defining two sample size parameters , where is the initial sample size, and is the truncation sample size, one can construct a stopping time associated with the threshold parameter : (19) Stop sampling at and reject the null hypothesis if and only if .…”
Section: Numeric Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider the test of versus . If we denote , the sample expectation of the data observed, , can be expressed as (17) where . Here the stopping time defined by sequential universal test is: (18) By defining two sample size parameters , where is the initial sample size, and is the truncation sample size, one can construct a stopping time associated with the threshold parameter : (19) Stop sampling at and reject the null hypothesis if and only if .…”
Section: Numeric Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several works investigate the universal source coding framework for sequential analysis [17], [18], which provide an alternative approach to study the asymptotical optimality for the sequential composite hypothesis testing problem. The approximation of the distribution of crossing boundary is established directly on the types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also for Gaussian f 0 and f 1 , θ ∈ [a 1 , a 2 ] , S n = n k=1 X k,l ,θ n = max{a 1 , min[S n /n, a 2 ]}. At time N decide upon H 0 or H 1 according asθ N ≤ θ * orθ N ≥ θ * , where θ * is obtained by solving I(θ * , θ 0 ) = I(θ * , θ 1 ), and I(θ, λ) is the Kullback-Leibler information number, which is the K-L Divergence I(f θ , f λ ) in (9). Here, as the threshold g(cn) is a time varying and decreasing function, the quantisation (7) is changed in the following way:…”
Section: E Unknown Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25] studies classification of finite alphabet sources using universal coding. [9] considers universal hypothesis testing problem in sequential framework using universal source coding. It derives asymptotically optimal one sided sequential hypothesis tests and sequential change detection algorithms for finite and countable alphabets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical inference with universal source codes, started in [27] where classification of finite alphabet sources is studied in the fixed sample size setup. [17] considers the universal hypothesis testing problem in the sequential framework using universal source coding. It derives asymptotically optimal one sided sequential hypothesis tests and sequential change detection algorithms for countable alphabet.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%