2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2020.114830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential effects of cleaning protocols on desorption of reverse osmosis membrane foulants: Autopsy results from a full-scale desalination plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, clues to cleaning agent selection were obtained by examining their relative performance in restoring permeability. EDTA slightly outperformed HCl and SDS for the lead element suggesting that it better chelated metals and reduced bioorganic-membrane adhesion forces in Stage 1. , In contrast, HCl slightly outperformed EDTA and SDS for the lag element agreeing with literature reports that it better targets inorganic foulants consistent with the higher solubility of many metals in acidic solutions. , We also performed sequential cleaning using EDTA (alkali/chelator) followed by HCl (acid), which has been shown to improve regeneration efficacy. , However, in our case, there were no further permeability improvements with both lead and lag elements attaining a specific flux of 51 L/(m 2 h MPa). The portion of membrane permeability that was irrevocably lost was attributed to chemically irreversible fouling rather than membrane compaction because the NF membranes were operated at pressures <8 bar, which is significantly below the threshold reported for inducing membrane compaction (>15 bar). , Hence, the remaining 25–30% of the virgin membrane’s productivity was irretrievably lost and attributed mostly to silicon fouling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nevertheless, clues to cleaning agent selection were obtained by examining their relative performance in restoring permeability. EDTA slightly outperformed HCl and SDS for the lead element suggesting that it better chelated metals and reduced bioorganic-membrane adhesion forces in Stage 1. , In contrast, HCl slightly outperformed EDTA and SDS for the lag element agreeing with literature reports that it better targets inorganic foulants consistent with the higher solubility of many metals in acidic solutions. , We also performed sequential cleaning using EDTA (alkali/chelator) followed by HCl (acid), which has been shown to improve regeneration efficacy. , However, in our case, there were no further permeability improvements with both lead and lag elements attaining a specific flux of 51 L/(m 2 h MPa). The portion of membrane permeability that was irrevocably lost was attributed to chemically irreversible fouling rather than membrane compaction because the NF membranes were operated at pressures <8 bar, which is significantly below the threshold reported for inducing membrane compaction (>15 bar). , Hence, the remaining 25–30% of the virgin membrane’s productivity was irretrievably lost and attributed mostly to silicon fouling.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A mixture of 0.1% NaOH and 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and a combination of 0.1% NaOH and 1% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) at an alkaline pH of 12 and 35 °C were individually applied to alleviate biological, organic, and polymerized silica fouling. A third cleaning agent (0.2% HCl) at pH 2 and 25 °C was also evaluated to remove mineral scale. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Basic solutions can remove an organic fouling layer by hydrolysis and solubilization [ 43 ]. Sequential cleaning protocols with different chemicals can be used to recover membrane performance [ 50 ].…”
Section: Ro Desalinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bdiri et al demonstrated the water–ethanol cleaning method was the optimal cleaning method for cleaning cation exchange membranes after treatment of food wastewater . Commonly, acid/base agents can remove the organic foulants on the membrane by solubilization or hydrolysis . Recently, ultrasonic cavitation has been used to enhance reactions and chemical processes, which can be used to enhance membrane cleaning efficiency. , However, no studies have focused on the recovery of ion exchange membrane performance after the treatment of resin regeneration wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%