2002
DOI: 10.1039/b111089f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential injection on-line matrix removal and trace metal preconcentration using a PTFE beads packed column as demonstrated for the determination of cadmium by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although ICPMS provides a multielement analysis capability with high detection sensitivity, the presence of a high content of sodium ions in the sample might create a serious matrix effect that would deteriorate the analytical results. There are a number of documented methods for removing the sodium matrix from complex mixtures, such as biological and seawater samples; the most common are solvent extraction, knotted reactor (KR), and flow injection methods using columns packed with PTFE beads or other types of resin. Solvent extraction is hard to couple on-line with the MD sampling probe and ICPMS, and thus, it is ruled out. The tiny sample amounts and lower recoveries render KR as a less-than-useful technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ICPMS provides a multielement analysis capability with high detection sensitivity, the presence of a high content of sodium ions in the sample might create a serious matrix effect that would deteriorate the analytical results. There are a number of documented methods for removing the sodium matrix from complex mixtures, such as biological and seawater samples; the most common are solvent extraction, knotted reactor (KR), and flow injection methods using columns packed with PTFE beads or other types of resin. Solvent extraction is hard to couple on-line with the MD sampling probe and ICPMS, and thus, it is ruled out. The tiny sample amounts and lower recoveries render KR as a less-than-useful technique.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…showed some parameters such as concentration factor, limit of detection and correlation coe cient removal of Ni 2+ ions by for various adsorbents and methods. Results demonstrated the proposed method is more accurate, simpler, and faster because it has a lower value of detection limit and less relative standard deviation[31][32][33][34][35]. ( Anthemidis et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous samples usually must be preconcentrated and separated due to low concentrations and matrix effects. Preconcentration and isolation techniques, such as ion exchange (Nabi et al, 2011;Mthombo et al, 2011), coprecipitation (Tokalioglu et al, 2007), liquid-liquid extraction (Liu et al, 2002;Malvankar and Shinde, 1991), solid phase extraction (Wang et al, 2012;Tuzen et al, 2005) (especially on-line solid phase extraction [Li et al, 2004;Wang and Hansen, 2002]), can be used to achieve a higher confidence level and provide a suitable extract for the determination of the trace elements. Cloud point extraction (CPE) is an efficient separation technique that achieves much a higher concentration of metal ions than liquid-liquid extraction (Ghaedi et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%