1976
DOI: 10.1007/bf00320131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential interval histogram analysis of non-stationary neuronal spike trains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, ISI i+1 was scatter-plotted against ISI i for each i N À 2. To characterize the local density of the return maps, we calculated joint-interval probability density distributions by convolving the points in the return maps with a two-variable Gaussian kernel (half-width: 0.75 ms, resolution: 0.1 ms) (Sanderson and Kobler, 1976;Szücs et al, 2003). The probability density distributions are plotted in grayscale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, ISI i+1 was scatter-plotted against ISI i for each i N À 2. To characterize the local density of the return maps, we calculated joint-interval probability density distributions by convolving the points in the return maps with a two-variable Gaussian kernel (half-width: 0.75 ms, resolution: 0.1 ms) (Sanderson and Kobler, 1976;Szücs et al, 2003). The probability density distributions are plotted in grayscale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the context of spike train analysis, several different approaches have been formulated to address the sampling problem, that is, the estimation of a probability function from a finite sample size, and different correction factors have been proposed (Optican et al, 1991;Panzeri & Treves, 1996;Sanderson & Kobler, 1976;Wolpert & Wolf, 1995). Here, the sampling problem is addressed by employing a best-fit analytic distribution to approximate the limit of an infinitely long data set.…”
Section: Estimating the Interval Entropy (H I )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used methods are characterized by several inherent limitations. For example, while the (peristimulus) rate histogram method which averages responses over many trials is still widely used (e.g., Dickman and Correia, 1989;Hullar et al, 2005;Hullar and Minor, 1999), its utility is limited by the implicit assumption that variations in firing rate pattern over the duration of a bin do not encode information, and it is prone to 'localization error' near bin edges (Bayly, 1968;French and Holden, 1971;Paulin, 1992;Richmond et al, 1990;Sanderson and Kobler, 1976). Likewise, the reciprocal interspike interval method, which is frequently used to obtain a measure of "instantaneous" firing (e.g., Dickman and Correia, 1989;Shaikh et al, 2004), is characterized by nonlinear behaviour and sensitivity to noise at high frequencies (Richmond et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%