2016
DOI: 10.7554/elife.13125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential phenotypic constraints on social information use in wild baboons

Abstract: Social information allows the rapid dissemination of novel information among individuals. However, an individual’s ability to use information is likely to be dependent on phenotypic constraints operating at three successive steps: acquisition, application, and exploitation. We tested this novel framework by quantifying the sequential process of social information use with experimental food patches in wild baboons (Papio ursinus). We identified phenotypic constraints at each step of the information use sequence… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
4
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In well connected populations (high degree, short path length) information can spread faster and farther 7;18;19 , a prediction that is borne out in humans 10;20 and non-human species [21][22][23][24] . Such networks might be optimal where group activity requires coordination, for example, in regards to social norms 25 and rituals 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In well connected populations (high degree, short path length) information can spread faster and farther 7;18;19 , a prediction that is borne out in humans 10;20 and non-human species [21][22][23][24] . Such networks might be optimal where group activity requires coordination, for example, in regards to social norms 25 and rituals 26 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of social information is a process with several stages, which are likely to be sequential and distinct: acquisition (observing another), application (performing the observed behaviour, not necessarily successfully) and exploitation (successfully performing the observed behaviour in a way that gives the individual an advantage; Carter, Tico & Cowlishaw, 2016; Guillette, Scott & Healy, 2016). For instance, in chacma baboons ( Papio ursinus ), the average individual acquired social information on <25% of occasions and exploited social information on <5% of occasions, and information use was dependent on phenotypic constraints such as network position and dominance status (Carter, Tico & Cowlishaw, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in chacma baboons ( Papio ursinus ), the average individual acquired social information on <25% of occasions and exploited social information on <5% of occasions, and information use was dependent on phenotypic constraints such as network position and dominance status (Carter, Tico & Cowlishaw, 2016). The results of Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that Eurasian jays did not appear to apply or exploit the social information available even though they had the opportunity to acquire it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diversity of habitats in which baboons live was highlighted by Alecia Carter's study of baboons in the edges of the Namib Desert at the Tsaobis Nature Park in Namibia, where she has documented information acquisition through dynamic social networks 18 . Variation in baboon social systems was eloquently presented by Julia Fischer, who discussed the nested multilevel society of Guinea baboons from the “neglected West.” 19 Fischer's work at Niokolo Koba National Park in Senegal reveals that the Guinea baboon social system is in some fundamental features similar to that of hamadryas baboons.…”
Section: The Paleo‐primate Project Gorongosamentioning
confidence: 99%