2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-014-9696-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential quadratic programming methods for parametric nonlinear optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In some situations, it is possible to guarantee that both E and D are zero, i.e., no convexification is needed. If the problem (6.1) is a convex program then it can be shown that the matrix B ν is positive definite with H = H (see Kungurtsev [37]). Similarly, the elements of H corresponding to fixed variables need not be modified because the corresponding elements of d are always zero.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In some situations, it is possible to guarantee that both E and D are zero, i.e., no convexification is needed. If the problem (6.1) is a convex program then it can be shown that the matrix B ν is positive definite with H = H (see Kungurtsev [37]). Similarly, the elements of H corresponding to fixed variables need not be modified because the corresponding elements of d are always zero.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is clearly impractical for any serious implementation. The discussion of more efficient methods that compute the modified matrix during the solution of the QP subproblem are beyond the scope of this paper (see Kungurtsev [37]). We recognize that other definitions of H are possible, including a positive-definite quasi-Newton approximations based on the BFGS update (see, e.g., [21,42]).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We applied the path-following ideas developed in Jäschke et al [24] and Kungurtsev and Diehl [28] to a large-scale process containing a reactor, a distillation column and a recycle stream. Compared with single-step updates based on solving a linear system of equations as proposed by [10], our path-following approach requires somewhat more computational effort.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that regardless of the inertia of the Lagrangian Hessian, if the SSOSC holds, it is positive definite on the null-space of the equality constraints, and thus, the QP defined is convex with an easily obtainable finite global minimizer. In [28], it is noted that as the solution to this QP is the directional derivative of the primal-dual solution of the NLP, it is a predictor step, a tangential first-order estimate of the change in the solution subject to a change in the parameter. We refer to the QP (10) as a pure-predictor.…”
Section: Proof See [26] (Sections 51 and 52) And [27] (Propositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation