2016
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2799228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Requisites Analysis: A New Method for Analyzing Sequential Relationships in Ordinal Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We extend prior case-based and small-N findings by providing a general description of how the liberalization process unfolds, with comparisons across several possible outcomes regardless of the architects' intent. Using a sample of 371 episodes of liberalizing autocracy from 1900 to 2019 (Edgell et al 2020), we employ pairwise domination analysisa method adapted from evolutionary biology (Lindenfors et al 2018;Lindenfors, Krusell and Lindberg 2019) to describe the general order of reforms in twenty-four indicators of democratic institutions and practices from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) data (Coppedge et al 2020). This independent pursuit of descriptionwhile uncommon in our disciplineallows us to avoid potential biases in the quality and quantity of our descriptive inferences (Gerring 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extend prior case-based and small-N findings by providing a general description of how the liberalization process unfolds, with comparisons across several possible outcomes regardless of the architects' intent. Using a sample of 371 episodes of liberalizing autocracy from 1900 to 2019 (Edgell et al 2020), we employ pairwise domination analysisa method adapted from evolutionary biology (Lindenfors et al 2018;Lindenfors, Krusell and Lindberg 2019) to describe the general order of reforms in twenty-four indicators of democratic institutions and practices from the Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) data (Coppedge et al 2020). This independent pursuit of descriptionwhile uncommon in our disciplineallows us to avoid potential biases in the quality and quantity of our descriptive inferences (Gerring 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%