2014
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1902
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequential Search and Learning from Rank Feedback: Theory and Experimental Evidence

Abstract: This paper studies the effect of limited information in a sequential search setting where a single selection is to be made from a set of random potential options. We consider both a full-information problem, where the decision maker observes the exact value of each option as she searches, and a partial-information problem, in which the decision maker only learns the rank of the current option relative to the options that have already been observed. We develop a model that allows for a sharp contrast between se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Needless to say, the findings presented in this paper require further investigation, both within the same contexts (e.g., by allowing the degree of risk aversion to be updated according to experience, or the degree of regret to differ from the degree of rejoice) and in alternative contexts. For example, research should consider unknown probability distributions (Palley and Kremer, 2014), unobserved outcomes of foregone alternatives, the additional possibility of choosing actions for exploration (Gonzalez, 2013;Cox, 2015), and learning from other people's experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Needless to say, the findings presented in this paper require further investigation, both within the same contexts (e.g., by allowing the degree of risk aversion to be updated according to experience, or the degree of regret to differ from the degree of rejoice) and in alternative contexts. For example, research should consider unknown probability distributions (Palley and Kremer, 2014), unobserved outcomes of foregone alternatives, the additional possibility of choosing actions for exploration (Gonzalez, 2013;Cox, 2015), and learning from other people's experience.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secretary problem's purpose is to determine a stopping rule that selects the optimal agent from a series of rankable agents. Generally, the stopping rule is derived to maximize the expected utility from limited information (Ferguson, 1989; Palley & Kremer, 2014). Considering that obtaining prior information regarding OCIO funds is difficult, conducting a search directly or visiting an OCIO provider for consultation is necessary.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model has been widely used to describe the information search and product purchase behavior of online consumers and help provide the best product display list [ 4 , 43 ]. Prior studies have shown that this model can accurately predict actual product sales ranks and consumer demand [ 44 , 45 ], estimate consumer information and product purchase behavior [ 41 , 44 , 46 , 47 ], and explain the impact of internal WOM and position ranking on consumers’ choices online [ 31 , 38 , 48 ]. In addition, the theory establishes the relationship between outside options and internal search.…”
Section: Theoretical Basis and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%