Sequential Support

Nisser, Martin; Zhu, Jinhan; Chen, Tianye; Bulovic, Katarina; Punpongsanon, Parinya; Mueller, Stefanie

doi:10.1145/3294109.3295630

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For instance, using simulation as a backend engine, Ion et al [16] enabled users to create complex Metamaterial Mechanisms [15], [35,43] can optimally embed electronic components into 3D printed objects, and AutoConnect [19] empowered users to create 3D printable and robust connectors. Sequential Support [28] also used simulations to harness time-dependent material dissolution as a fabrication strategy. Situated among this literature, we believe that SimuLearn's speed and accuracy will allow available CAD tools to become more augmentative and effective in forward and inverse design tasks.…”

Section: Functional Simulation In Hcimentioning

confidence: 99%

SimuLearn

Yang

Qian

Liu

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Morphing materials allow us to create new modalities of interaction and fabrication by leveraging the materials' dynamic behaviors. Yet, despite the ongoing rapid growth of computational tools within this realm, current developments are bottlenecked by the lack of an effective simulation method. As a result, existing design tools must trade-off between speed and accuracy to support a real-time interactive design scenario. In response, we introduce SimuLearn, a data-driven method that combines finite element analysis and machine learning to create real-time (0.61 seconds) and truthful (97% accuracy) morphing material simulators. We use mesh-like 4D printed structures to contextualize this method and prototype design tools to exemplify the design workflows and spaces enabled by a fast and accurate simulation method. Situating this work among existing literature, we believe SimuLearn is a timely addition to the HCI CAD toolbox that can enable the proliferation of morphing materials.

show abstract

Section: Functional Simulation In Hcimentioning

confidence: 99%

SimuLearn

Yang

Qian

Liu

et al. 2020

Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Exploiting flexible thermoplastic such as TPU, through the different buckling behaviors of heterogeneous materials when attached together, the transformation of a flat sheet into a sophisticated 3D shape has become available for desktop 3D printers [2]. Use of water-soluble material with regular plastic further expanded application scenarios of 3D printed artifacts, such as optically identifiable object [18], object with wash-away assembly keys [23] and more. Nonetheless, these approaches have mostly been possible with advanced hardware, which still presents numerous practical issues, listed above.…”

Section: Increasing Needs In Multi-materials Printingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Programmable Filament

Takahashi

Punpongsanon

Kim

2020

Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

3D printing is one of the effective scaffold fabrication techniques that emerged in the 21st century that has the potential to revolutionize the field of tissue engineering. The solid scaffolds developed by 3D printing are still one of the most sought-after approaches for developing hard-tissue regeneration and repair. However, applications of these solid scaffolds get limited due to their poor surface and bulk properties, which play a significant role in tissue integration, loadbearing, antimicrobial/antifouling properties, and others. As a result, several efforts have been directed to modify the surface and bulk of these solid scaffolds. These modifications have significantly improved the adoption of 3D-printed solid scaffolds and devices in the healthcare industry. Nevertheless, the in vivo implant applications of these 3D-printed solid scaffolds/devices are still under development. They require attention in terms of their surface/bulk properties, which dictate their functionality. Therefore, in the current review, we have discussed different 3D-printing parameters that facilitate the fabrication of solid scaffolds/devices with different properties. Further, changes in the bulk properties through material and microstructure modification are also being discussed. After that, we deliberated on the techniques that modify the surfaces through chemical and material modifications. The computational approaches for the bulk modification of these 3D-printed materials are also mentioned, focusing on tissue engineering. We have also briefly discussed the application of these solid scaffolds/devices in tissue engineering. Eventually, the review is concluded with an analysis of the choice of surface/bulk modification based on the intended application in tissue engineering.

show abstract

Sequential Support

Cited by 10 publications

References 28 publications

SimuLearn

SimuLearn

Programmable Filament

Strategies To Modify the Surface and Bulk Properties of 3D-Printed Solid Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering Applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About