2013
DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sequestration by IFIT1 Impairs Translation of 2′O-unmethylated Capped RNA

Abstract: Viruses that generate capped RNA lacking 2′O methylation on the first ribose are severely affected by the antiviral activity of Type I interferons. We used proteome-wide affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry to identify human and mouse proteins specifically binding to capped RNA with different methylation states. This analysis, complemented with functional validation experiments, revealed that IFIT1 is the sole interferon-induced protein displaying higher affinity for unmethylated than for methyla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
263
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
16
263
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four members of the human IFIT family regulate translation by differentially recognizing the 5= termini of their target RNA (28,48). The exact features in the RNA that they recognize is a matter of some debate, but the current consensus is that they bind to 2=-O-unmethylated 5= cap structure (cap 0) and/or 5=-triphosphates (5=-ppp) on the RNA, which are generally absent in cellular mRNA but found in transcripts of intracellular pathogens, such as viruses that lack cap methyltransferase activity and bacteria (62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67). IFIT1, in particular, shows a high preference for mRNA with unmethylated cap (63-67), whereas IFIT5, which had no inhibitory effect on PIV3, prefers capless, 5=-ppp RNA (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The four members of the human IFIT family regulate translation by differentially recognizing the 5= termini of their target RNA (28,48). The exact features in the RNA that they recognize is a matter of some debate, but the current consensus is that they bind to 2=-O-unmethylated 5= cap structure (cap 0) and/or 5=-triphosphates (5=-ppp) on the RNA, which are generally absent in cellular mRNA but found in transcripts of intracellular pathogens, such as viruses that lack cap methyltransferase activity and bacteria (62)(63)(64)(65)(66)(67). IFIT1, in particular, shows a high preference for mRNA with unmethylated cap (63-67), whereas IFIT5, which had no inhibitory effect on PIV3, prefers capless, 5=-ppp RNA (67).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large subset of the ISGs has direct antiviral activity through their capacity to block specific steps in the viral life cycle [34]. This includes, for instance, IFIT1, which binds viral 5 0 -triphosphate RNA, thus sequestering the DNA from the eukaryotic translation initiation factors [35,36]. Other ISGs serve to orchestrate the cellular innate immune response.…”
Section: Type I Ifn Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some viruses encode enzymes for 7mGpppN formation and, less frequently, the ribose 2′-O-methylation necessary to generate cap1 (6). Recent studies show that virally encoded cap 2′-O-methyltransferase activity can inhibit the innate immune response (7)(8)(9)(10)(11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recombinant IFIT family proteins range from monomer to multimer, with crystal structures solved for a human IFIT2 homodimer (17), the human IFIT5 monomer (16,18,19), and an N-terminal fragment of human IFIT1 (18). Studies of IFIT1 report its preferential binding to either 5′ triphosphate (ppp) RNA (15) or cap0 RNA (11,20) or optimally cap0 without guanosine N7-methylation (10). Reports of IFIT5 RNA binding specificity are likewise inconsistent: the protein has been described to bind RNA single-stranded 5′ ends with ppp and monophosphate (p) but not OH (16); ppp but not p, OH, or cap0 (18); ppp but not cap0 (10,20); or single-stranded 5′-p RNA and double-stranded DNA (19).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%