2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial dependence does not originate from low-level visual processing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

18
124
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
18
124
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this view, SD in perceptual biases is a sequential effect of decisions on a specific dimension of sensory input, which may be independent of all other aspects of stimuli 17 . Interestingly, this would even predict SD for completely different stimuli, provided that they share a common task-relevant dimension 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this view, SD in perceptual biases is a sequential effect of decisions on a specific dimension of sensory input, which may be independent of all other aspects of stimuli 17 . Interestingly, this would even predict SD for completely different stimuli, provided that they share a common task-relevant dimension 29 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of this view, it has been shown that higher confidence levels on the previous trial response increase the serial dependence effect even when the previous trial stimulus uncertainty is the same (Samaha et al, 2019). In addition, manipulating the uncertainty of the stimulus in the previous trial does not affect serial dependence (Ceylan et al, 2021). This is an interesting topic and it remains an open question how much the uncertainty stored in implicit memory relies on the uncertainty of the previous trial sensory information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…There is a growing interest in the serial dependence literature to identify the source of serial dependence: whether it comes from sensory signals (Cicchini et al, 2017;, biased percepts (Cicchini et al, 2021;Collins, 2020;Fornaciai & Park, 2020), decision processes (Ceylan et al, 2021;Fischer et al, 2020;Fritsche et al, 2017;Pascucci et al, 2019;Roseboom, 2019) or motor responses (St. John-Saaltink et al, 2016). A limitation of the present work is that speed, time-to-contact, and motor responses are correlated, preventing us from pinpointing the source of serial dependence in the coincident timing task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude parameter a was taken as the strength of the serial dependence bias, indicating the degree to which participants' judgments of each facial trait were biased towards the direction of the previous faces ( Liberman et al, 2014 ; Manassi et al, 2017 ; Fritsche et al, 2020 ). Here, we averaged the ratings of all participants for each facial trait and fitted the DoG function, which is a default protocol used by previous studies ( Bliss et al, 2017 ; Fritsche et al, 2020 ; Ceylan et al, 2021 ) because it can systematically test serial dependence effect by measuring how the group average of response errors changes as a function of the difference between the previous and current facial trait value ( Bliss et al, 2017 ; Fritsche et al, 2020 ; Ceylan et al, 2021 ). The value of parameter a of the DoG can reveal the level of serial dependence effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of them were naïve to the purpose of the experiment and provided informed consent, with ethics approved by the Ethics Committee at Soochow University, China. At the beginning, we chose 30 as the sample size (considering the dramatic different in experimental design and the purpose of the current study, we adapted the sample size of previous studies; Fritsche et al, 2020 ; Ceylan, Herzog, & Pascucci, 2021 ). However, two more subjects signed in before we closed the registration, so we still tested them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%