2009
DOI: 10.1080/03615260802669094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial or Monograph: Who Decides?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…124 Carter discussed the dilemma of determining appropriate cataloging treatment for serials she identifies as quasi-serials; these are serials with both monographic and serial characteristics, such as standing orders and analytical series. 125 For example, batchloading MARC records for e-books often results in inconsistent cataloging treatment for these quasi-serials. Carter explained that these records are often loaded into the catalog with no check to determine whether any of the e-book titles loaded had historically received serial treatment.…”
Section: Value Of Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…124 Carter discussed the dilemma of determining appropriate cataloging treatment for serials she identifies as quasi-serials; these are serials with both monographic and serial characteristics, such as standing orders and analytical series. 125 For example, batchloading MARC records for e-books often results in inconsistent cataloging treatment for these quasi-serials. Carter explained that these records are often loaded into the catalog with no check to determine whether any of the e-book titles loaded had historically received serial treatment.…”
Section: Value Of Automationmentioning
confidence: 99%