2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0028470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serial recall, word frequency, and mixed lists: The influence of item arrangement.

Abstract: Studies of the effect of word frequency in the serial recall task show that lists of high-frequency words are better recalled than lists of low-frequency words; however, when high-and low-frequency words are alternated within a list, there is no difference in the level of recall for the two types of words, and recall is intermediate between lists of pure frequency. This pattern has been argued to arise from the development of a network of activated long-term representations of list items that support the redin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, where the distinct effects of list composition are readily observed. The patterns for the pure, alternating, and half-list formats replicated those obtained in previous experiments (Hulme et al, 2003;Miller & Roodenrys, 2012), while the novel sequence format was consistent with the half-list condition, in that the convergence of the curves occurred at the point of change of item type. The means for formats collapsed across list types suggested that the variation in the overall level of performance for each condition was small; descriptively, the items in pure lists were recalled the least well (M 0 .535), followed by those in alternating lists (M 0 .541) and then half lists (M 0 .559), while the items in the sequence lists were recalled the most (M 0 .583).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1, where the distinct effects of list composition are readily observed. The patterns for the pure, alternating, and half-list formats replicated those obtained in previous experiments (Hulme et al, 2003;Miller & Roodenrys, 2012), while the novel sequence format was consistent with the half-list condition, in that the convergence of the curves occurred at the point of change of item type. The means for formats collapsed across list types suggested that the variation in the overall level of performance for each condition was small; descriptively, the items in pure lists were recalled the least well (M 0 .535), followed by those in alternating lists (M 0 .541) and then half lists (M 0 .559), while the items in the sequence lists were recalled the most (M 0 .583).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The stimulus sets were those used by Miller and Roodenrys (2012). The two sets of 96 CVC words selected on the basis of frequency ratings (instances per million words of text) were drawn from the Celex database (Baayen, Piepenbrock, & Van Rijan, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to this co-occurrence hypothesis, when a word is presented in a list its activation spreads to other items in the list via connections between the items in Chapter Eight: The Phonological Neighbourhood Effect on Short-Term Memory for Order: Serial Reconstruction long-term memory. Items that already share strong connections in long-term memory, such as items that co-occur often in language, will have a greater level of pre-existing activation that will assist in recall (Miller & Roodenrys, 2012). The co-occurrence approach bears similarity to the semantic binding hypothesis (Patterson, Graham, & Hodges, 1994) where patterns of phonemes become associated with one another and to a semantic representation due to a high level of co-occurrence between all of these components in speech perception and production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%