2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference
DOI: 10.1109/vetecs.2006.1682768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Serially Concatenated Luby Transform Coding and Bit-Interleaved Coded Modulation Using Iteratlive Decoding for the Wireless Internet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For the sake of reliably recovering the entire original file, the LT encoder seen in Figure 1 generates L = L k + Le number of packets from the incoming L k packets, where Le is the number of redundant packets that has to be as low as possible. The so-called improved robust degree distribution of LT codes [10] was used for the sake of achieving as low packet overhead, i.e. Le as possible 1 Then, the LT-protected packets are transmitted over the Internet, which is, again modeled as a BEC having an erasure probability of Pe.…”
Section: Ii-a System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the sake of reliably recovering the entire original file, the LT encoder seen in Figure 1 generates L = L k + Le number of packets from the incoming L k packets, where Le is the number of redundant packets that has to be as low as possible. The so-called improved robust degree distribution of LT codes [10] was used for the sake of achieving as low packet overhead, i.e. Le as possible 1 Then, the LT-protected packets are transmitted over the Internet, which is, again modeled as a BEC having an erasure probability of Pe.…”
Section: Ii-a System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the LT decoder only requiresL number of packets for recovering the data file, the packet selector of Figure 1 chooses appropriately optimizedL packets, which contains the lowest number of errors from the BI-DST-CM-ID decoder based on the proposed LLR-based packet reliability estimation algorithm, which will be outlined immediately in Section II-B. Finally, the LT decoder [10] of Figure 1, recovers the data file using theL number of unerased packets, which are likely to be error-free and hence avoids the otherwise inevitable avalanche-like LT decoding error propagation.…”
Section: Ii-a System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When employed for transmission over wireless channels, which impose both fading and intersymbol interference (ISI), the LT code might become contaminated, which results in catastrophic inter-packet error propagation during LT decoding [23]. In order to mitigate the deleterious effects of error propagation, LT codes have been frequently combined with classic physicallayer FEC codes [23,24]. The idea of combining classic FEC codes with LT codes by directly amalgamating them was proposed in [6], where systematically concatenated parity bits were incorporated in order to create the family of SLT codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the LT decoder processes error-infested pack-LT decoding is 11 000. Then we have to consider two ets, the error will be propagated to all other packets, decoding scenarios, namely when the number of errowhich are related to this particular packet, as determined neous packets is higher than 11 700 -11 000 = 700, as by the LT code's degree distribution [11]. Hence we well as when it is lower than 700.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%