1992
DOI: 10.1177/014662169201600201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seriation and Multidimensional Scaling: A Data Analysis Approach to Scaling Asymmetric Proximity Matrices

Abstract: BackgroundSeriation is a procedure that orders stimuli according to structure within a proximity matrix. The method was developed within electrical engi-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, ordering (5, 3, 6, 1, 2) maximizes the sum of the elements of the upper triangle of Γ, which is a common criterion for unidimensional seriation of an asymmetric matrix (see Golledge 1981, Chapter 4 in Hubert et al 2001). On the contrary, ordering (2, 1, 6, 3, 5) maximizes the sum in the lower triangle of Γ, as observed in Rodgers and Thompson (1992). Ordering (5, 3, 6, 1, 2) can also be characterized as a result of applying to Γ the model…”
Section: Dichotomous Casementioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, ordering (5, 3, 6, 1, 2) maximizes the sum of the elements of the upper triangle of Γ, which is a common criterion for unidimensional seriation of an asymmetric matrix (see Golledge 1981, Chapter 4 in Hubert et al 2001). On the contrary, ordering (2, 1, 6, 3, 5) maximizes the sum in the lower triangle of Γ, as observed in Rodgers and Thompson (1992). Ordering (5, 3, 6, 1, 2) can also be characterized as a result of applying to Γ the model…”
Section: Dichotomous Casementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hubert and Golledge 1981, Hubert et al 2001, Brusco andStahl 2001), some authors (e.g. Rodgers and Thompson 1992) argued that it can profitably interact with multidimensional scaling (MDS) in the analysis of asymmetric proximity matrices, for reasons such as MDS could add meaningful information regarding dependencies between objects. Following this line of thought, the next sections feature some procedures to combine seriation and asymmetric MDS, for the dichotomous and the quantitative case respectively, and two short possible applications will be provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ordering of n objects along a continuum has long been recognized as an important and practical problem (Baker & Hubert, 1977;Flueck & Korsh, 1974;Hubert, 1974;Hubert, 1976;Hubert & Golledge, 1981;Rodgers & Thompson, 1992). The general goal associated with asymmetric unidimensional seriation is to find a permutation of the rows and columns of an n x n asymmetric proximity matrix, such that the information in the reordered matrix is more easily interpreted.…”
Section: Multiobjective Programming Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, seriation and scaling of asymmetric proximity matrices is an important and well-studied problem in the psychometric literature (Baker & Hubert, 1977;Constantine & Gower, 1978;De Soete, Hubert, &Arabie, 1988;Groenen & Heiser, 1996;Holman, 1979;Hubert, 1976;Hubert & Golledge, 1981;Hutchinson, 1989;Levin & Brown, 1979;Rodgers & Thompson, 1992;Weeks & Bentler, 1982;Zielman & Heiser, 1996). Second, a variety of solution methods, employing various objective criteria, have been suggested for asymmetric seriation (Baker & Hubert, 1977;Hubert, 1976;Hubert & Golledge, 1981;Rodgers & Thompson, 1992). Third, single objective problems--hereafter referred to as uniobjective problems--of a reasonable size can be solved to optimality using dynamic programming (Hubert & Golledge) and these approaches are readily extensible to weighted multiobjective problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%