2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11004-018-9768-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Series Expansion-Based Genetic Inversion of Wireline Logging Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Combining Equations ( 6) and ( 7), the response function now depends on depth coordinates; therefore, the model parameters are interchanged by the series of expansion coefficients leading to a highly overdetermined inversion problem since the required number of expansion coefficients to describe the model parameters is smaller than the number of inverted data. For solving the inverse problem, we apply a genetic algorithmbased inversion approach, which assures to search for the global minimum of the deviation between the measured and calculated well logs and provides an initial-model independent solution [36]. In shale gas formations, the inversion method previously gave accurate estimation for kerogen volume (V k ), porosity (Φ), water saturation in invaded and virgin zone (S x0 and S w ), matrix (here quartz) volume (V ma ), clay content (V c ) and silt content (V s ), including their estimation errors in a joint inversion procedure [37].…”
Section: Application Of Interval Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining Equations ( 6) and ( 7), the response function now depends on depth coordinates; therefore, the model parameters are interchanged by the series of expansion coefficients leading to a highly overdetermined inversion problem since the required number of expansion coefficients to describe the model parameters is smaller than the number of inverted data. For solving the inverse problem, we apply a genetic algorithmbased inversion approach, which assures to search for the global minimum of the deviation between the measured and calculated well logs and provides an initial-model independent solution [36]. In shale gas formations, the inversion method previously gave accurate estimation for kerogen volume (V k ), porosity (Φ), water saturation in invaded and virgin zone (S x0 and S w ), matrix (here quartz) volume (V ma ), clay content (V c ) and silt content (V s ), including their estimation errors in a joint inversion procedure [37].…”
Section: Application Of Interval Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another viable strategy to mitigate the curse of dimensionality and to reduce the computational complexity of high‐dimensional inverse problems is to compress the model space through appropriate reparameterization techniques (Fernández‐Martínez et al ., 2011; Azevedo et al ., 2016; Aleardi, 2019; Szabó and Dobróka, 2019; Numes et al ., 2019; Aleardi 2020b). However, it should be noted that the parameterization of an inverse problem must always constitute a compromise between model resolution and model uncertainty (Grana et al ., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods make use of different orthogonal basis functions (e.g., principal component analysis, wavelet transforms, Legendre polynomials, Discrete Cosine Transform) to reduce the dimensionality as well as the computational complexity of inverse problems. After such reparameterization, the unknown parameters become the numerical coefficients that multiply the basis functions (Dejtrakulwong et al, 2012;Lochbühler et al 2014;Fernández Martínez et al 2017;Aleardi 2019;Szabó and Dobróka, 2019). However, the compression should be applied keeping in mind that the model parameterization must always constitute a compromise between model resolution and model uncertainty (Grana et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%