Series Introduction: Mapping Mass Dictatorship: Towards a Transnational History of Twentieth-Century Dictatorship

Lim, Jie-Hyun

doi:10.1057/9780230283275_1

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Inspired by the growing historical reassessment of the so-called mass totalitarian states (Suny, 2008; Corner, 2009; Hellbeck, 2009; Lim, 2011; Cai, 2016; Lüdtke, 2016), this article aims to shed new light on Maoist culture and politics by examining how creative and self-reflexive agency figured in Communist ideals. Following Cai Xiang’s 蔡翔 work in particular, I take Maoist discourse seriously and argue against the tendency to view the regime as intrinsically hostile to the production of “authentic” diaries and self.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

How to Write a Diary in Mao’s New China: Guidebooks in the Crafting of Socialist Subjectivities

Windscript

2020

Modern China

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Maoist regime has conventionally been understood as a totalitarian apparatus hostile to the individual. Yet the mass dictatorship also saw the proliferation of guidebooks on how to write a diary. This article is a pioneering exploration of these didactic texts, situating them within a longer Chinese tradition of popular subjectivation. A close reading of the guidebooks in light of their Republican predecessors suggests that the regime simultaneously anticipated the individual’s role as revolutionary agent of change and viewed it with trepidation. Prescribing paradigmatic frameworks for constructing socialist subjectivities, the manuals propagated journal-keeping as a political routine by which to shape the writer’s life and selfhood. Central in these teachings was the desire to mobilize yet monopolize the individual’s conscious agency. At once empowering and constraining, the “how-to” books rendered creative self-reflexivity indispensable—albeit dangerous—to the Maoist agenda, revealing a deep-seated anxiety of the state about socialism’s modern legacies.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%