2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.explore.2007.03.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Series Position Effects in Random Event Generator Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…B. Rhine, 1969) as well as in the early dice tests for PK (Pratt, 1949, p. 15;Reeves & Rhine, 1943). It has also been observed in some PK tests using RNGs (Berger, 1988a;Houtkooper, 2002b), most notably in the benchmark experimental series conducted by the PEAR Laboratory (Dunne et al, 1994;Jahn & Dunne, 2011, pp. 178-179;Nelson et al, 2000) (Figure 7), as well as in the subsequent Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium replication (Jahn et al, 2000).…”
Section: Other Notable Micro-pk Effectsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…B. Rhine, 1969) as well as in the early dice tests for PK (Pratt, 1949, p. 15;Reeves & Rhine, 1943). It has also been observed in some PK tests using RNGs (Berger, 1988a;Houtkooper, 2002b), most notably in the benchmark experimental series conducted by the PEAR Laboratory (Dunne et al, 1994;Jahn & Dunne, 2011, pp. 178-179;Nelson et al, 2000) (Figure 7), as well as in the subsequent Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium replication (Jahn et al, 2000).…”
Section: Other Notable Micro-pk Effectsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…B. Rhine, 1969) as well as in the early dice tests for PK (Pratt, 1949, p. 15;Reeves & Rhine, 1943). It has also been observed in some PK tests using RNGs (Berger, 1988a;Houtkooper, 2002b), most notably in the benchmark experimental series conducted by the PEAR Laboratory (Dunne et al, 1994;Jahn & Dunne, 2011, pp. 178-179;Nelson et al, 2000) (Figure 7), as well as in the subsequent Mind/Machine Interaction Consortium replication .…”
Section: Other Notable Micro-pk Effectsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Specifically, there are statistically significant tendencies for operators to produce better scores in their first series, then to fall off in performance in their second and third, and eventually to recover to some intermediate levels during their fourth, fifth, or subsequent series. Such correlation appears in both local and remote experiments and is also indicated over a sequence of other experimental protocols, but no such effects appear in the baseline or calibration data [10]. Survey of standard psychological literature indicates that similar patterns have been identified in more conventional experiments on perception, cognition, and memory, suggesting that our anomalous serial position effects are primarily psychological in origin, and may subsume the rudimentary 'decline,' 'primacy,' 'recency,' and 'terminal' effects propounded in the parapsychological and psychological literature.…”
Section: Serial Position Effectsmentioning
confidence: 81%