Fourth International Symposium on Bovine Leukosis 1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-011-9090-9_60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seroepidemiological Survey of Bovine Leukaemia Virus Infection in Canadian Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1980, national prevalence of BLV infection in Canadian dairy herds was estimated at 40.5%, while only 9.3% of tested cattle were positive (Samagh and Kellar, 1982). However, 15-20 years later, infection levels appeared to have increased substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In 1980, national prevalence of BLV infection in Canadian dairy herds was estimated at 40.5%, while only 9.3% of tested cattle were positive (Samagh and Kellar, 1982). However, 15-20 years later, infection levels appeared to have increased substantially.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In North America, prevalence of the infection has been high and appears to have a rising trend (Samagh and Kellar, 1982;Richardson and Macaulay, 1992;Sargeant et al, 1997;VanLeeuwen et al, 2001;VanLeeuwen et al, 2005;VanLeeuwen et al, 2006;Bartlett et al, 2014). For instance, in Prince Edward Island, Canada, herd-level prevalence of BLV was 49.2% in 1989 (Richardson and Macaulay, 1992), increased to 63.3% in 1998 (VanLeeuwen et al, 2001), and is currently at 90% based on a survey of bulk tank milk in all dairy herds in the province completed in 2013 (O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Immunologically relevant proteins of the BLV virion include the membrane glycoproteins gp51 and gp30 and the major core protein p24 (DESHAYES et al, 1977(DESHAYES et al, , 1980. Several reports have shown that BLV-infection is widespread in cattle from the American continent ( M A R~N et al, 1978;SAMAGH and KELLAR, 1982; DIGIACOMO, 1992). Economically, it is important due to restrictions in importation of seropositive animals and culling of clinically affected animals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%